77

General

Converse court case highlights imitation sale issue

admin
May 23rd, 2014


This article is more than 10 years old.

The financial crisis has pushed the Danish shops to take more risks

The US shoe company Converse has accused a string of Danish supermarkets of selling illegal fake Converse products to their customers, according to Metroxpress newspaper.

Converse is currently suing Kvickly, Fakta, Lidl and Harald Nyborg, all of which are accused of selling fake Converse All Star shoes and boots back in 2012. The court case is expected to start next month with millions of kroner on the line.

“I haven’t seen any proof that the Converse shoes were fakes,” Per Sjøqvist, the lawyer representing Fakta and Kvickly, told Metroxpress. Lidl and Harald Nyborg did not wish to comment.

As opposed to Fakta and Kvickly, Lidl and Harald Nyborg did not inform their customers that Converse had notified them that the shoes were fake.

READ MORE: Politicians considering new passport scanners to tackle illegal entry

The dark side
And the Converse case is far from the only one, according to Hanne Weywardt, a lawyer and partner in MAQS Law Firm. The sale of imitation goods is on the rise in Denmark.

“Our law firm encounters a handful of new cases each month involving supermarkets selling imitated trademark goods,” Weywardt said.

According to Henrik G Jacobsen, a lawyer from The IPR Company, the financial crisis has pushed Danish shops to take more risks to reap the lucrative rewards from selling imitation goods.

But there is a dark side to imitation goods. Pirate copies are often imported by criminal organisations that don’t pay taxes, and western companies are hit hard when people buy cheap Chinese copies. Products can also be unregulated and contain toxic compounds that are a danger to the consumer, Jacobsen said.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”