31

News

Kurdish family claim length of son’s sentence is unprecedented and fuelled by racism

admin
May 15th, 2014


This article is more than 10 years old.

After a young man was stabbed to death in Høje-Taastrup Station last year, 17-year-old Hikmet Sahbaz has been sentenced to 10 years in prison for complicity. Now, in the very same train station, Sahbaz’s father is protesting the court’s decision via hunger strike.

Last October, police arrived at Høje-Taastrup Station in response to reports of a fight. They found 19-year-old Ricko Træholt there, dead from stab wounds to the chest and neck.

Hikmet Sahbaz, 17, and Turgay Yacin, 20, were eventually taken into custody for their involvement in the fatal stabbing of Træholt, as well as the non-fatal stabbing of Træholt’s 16-year-old friend.

Sahbaz admitted that he was involved in the fight and at the scene when the crime occurred, but maintains that he only hit Træholt with a blunt object and never stabbed him.

However, last week the boys were awarded double-digit sentences. Yacin got 14 years for manslaughter and Sahbaz ten years for complicity.

Sahbaz’s family and members of the international community see his decade-long sentence as an example of Danish xenophobic attitudes and have criticised Denmark’s legal system.

While Sahbaz was born and raised in Denmark, he is of Kurdish descent, and many think this may have played a role in his conviction and harsh sentencing.

Father on hunger strike
Sahbaz’s father, Ali Riza Sahbaz, has taken it upon himself to openly protest against the ruling by going on a public hunger strike at Høje-Taastrup Station.

The sign he keeps beside him reads: "I do not trust the Danish legal system. My son has been singled out as a victim.” 

"The most important thing right now is my son," he told Rudaw. "Our son is a victim, like the boy Ricko Træholt who was killed."

Sahbaz’s aunt, Meliha Kuscu, agrees.

"Hikmet has received punishment that Danish teenagers have not received in preceding cases," she told the Anadolu Agency.

"[He has] received a penalty despite not committing the murder; we see this as racist action.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”