119

Politics

Political scandals cast new light on freedom of information act

admin
January 21st, 2014


This article is more than 10 years old.

The freedom of information act, offentlighedsloven, is facing renewed criticism following the recent scandal that cost PM Helle Thorning-Schmidt (S) an official reprimand.

The PM’s involvement in the 'Christiania Case' scandal only came to light because an email correspondence between the Justice Ministry and the Prime Minister’s Office was handed over to parliament’s legal committee.

The emails reveal that the Prime Minister’s Office had known for some time that the former justice minister, Morten Bødskov (S), had lied to parliament about why a trip to Christiania had to be cancelled, which ultimately led to his departure.

READ MORE: PM’s nose grows with reprimand

Less freedom
Bødskov's lie itself would also never have been publicly known if agents working for the domestic intelligence agency PET had also not leaked information to the press.

The new freedom of information act came into effect on January 1, and prevents correspondence between ministries from being released to the public through freedom of information requests.

All parties except Enhedslisten, Dansk Folkeparti (DF) and Liberal Alliance – parties that traditionally do not hold ministerial positions – voted in favour of the law.

READ MORE: Demonstration against freedom of information act draws hundreds

Review the law
“With regard to the papers that Helle Thorning has presented, we can see the openness has not increased [with the new freedom of information act],” Enhedslisten’s legal spokesperson Pernille Skipper told DR Nyheder.

DF also question whether the case would have come to light by requesting government documents, and have called for the law to be reviewed before 2017, as is planned.

“The problem is that there was always a majority who didn’t agree with our view, but we can only hope that this case makes the majority reconsider, and that the government decides to pursue a more open freedom of information act,” DF's legal spokesperson, Peter Skaarup, told DR Nyheder.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”