68

Business

DSB out of Sweden after “financial disagreement”

admin
December 19th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

DSB said in a press release that cutting loose assets in Sweden fit with its strategy

DSB’s failed adventure into Sweden is running out of track. The Swedish traffic authorities decided to drop the national railway provider’s daughter company DSB Småland in favour of the French transportation giants Veolia for the Krösatågstrafiken railway stretches in southern Sweden.

DSB revealed that an agreement signed last year included a section that would allow the two parties to end their partnership prematurely. Financial disagreements have now catalysed an end to the agreement.

“The hand-over of Krösatågstrafiken is in accordance with DSB’s strategy about a healthy DSB, including in the remaining foreign operations,” Peter Christensen, the head of DSB Sverige, said in a press release. “We will now begin preparations for the practical hand-over.”

READ MORE: Public transport fares to rise again

Cutting ties abroad
DSB officially ended its foreign excursion into Sweden and Germany in the spring of 2011 after the infamous DSBFirst scandal began to gather momentum, but the railway provider has remained involved in the two countries in a limited capacity.

Last year, DSB withdrew from deficit-ridden activities in DSB Väst and Roslagsbanen and today it only operates a single stretch of rail in Sweden, DSB Uppland, and a small stretch in Germany.

According to the Transport Ministry, DSB’s foray into foreign markets has cost the state coffers close to 700 million kroner.

READ MORE: DSB reveals solid quarterly profits as IC4s prepare to hit rails

Profits, prices on the up
Severing its ties abroad may have begun to pay dividends. Last month DSB conveyed that it had managed to produce solid profits of over 300 million kroner after the first three quarters of 2013.

While that was a 367-million kroner improvement from the year before, DSB’s customers were still notified this week that they could expect a ticket-price increase in January.

DSB indicated that the employees in DSB Småland will be offered jobs with Veolia in connection with the hand-over.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”