90

Politics

Major funding boost for psychiatric care

admin
November 28th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

The government wants to trial force-free psychiatric wards in order to address the high level of force currently used to subdue patients

A political agreement has secured 410 million kroner for psychiatry and 50 million kroner for other health initiatives over the next four years.

The funding comes from the so-called ‘satspuljen’, a fund for social initiatives that is distributed every year by all parties except the far-left Enhedslisten.

In a press release, the minister for children, integration and social affairs, Annette Vilhelmsen (SF), said the funding would help health authorities across councils and regions provide better psychiatric care.

READ MORE: Successful immigrant mentoring programme loses funding

Focus on people’s needs
“I am pleased that we he set aside 410 million kroner to improve the care for people with psychiatric problems,” Vilhelmsen wrote. “It’s important that the focus is on people’s needs, rather than the authorities.”

The health minister, Astrid Krag, added that the deal would improve research into psychiatric care, which will improve the quality of care.

“I am exteremely pleased with the 16 new initiatives that follow up on recommendations made by parliament’s psychiatry committee, and which is an important step in the work to improve the quality of care for people who are affected by psychiatric illness,” Krag said.

Reduced force
Among the initiatives is a 73.6 million kroner trial to end the use of the forcible detention of patients in psychiatric wards.

“This is a ground-breaking initiative because every year we are criticised for our use of force,” MP Özlem Cekic (SF) told Politiken newspaper. “Our experience from this force-free wards will of course be used to help us limit the amount of force we use in other wards,” Cekic added, pointing out that the government wants to halve the amount of psychiatric patients that are restrained using force.

RELATED ARTICLES

"I would never have found a job without my mentor"

Successful immigrant mentoring programme loses funding

Ethnic minority group's funding "better spent elsewhere"


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”