90

Politics

Gov’t turns to opposition to secure budget

admin
November 27th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Key ally expresses disappointment but rejects speculation it will force election by withdrawing support

After weeks of increasingly strained budget negotiations with its left-wing ally ground to a halt yesterday, the government turned to the opposition last night to secure a deal. 

The surprise agreement with Venstre and Konservative fell into place within a few hours of party negotiators sitting down with the finance minister, Bjarne Corydon (S). 

Up until Tuesday, Corydon had otherwise appeared close to a deal with Enhedslisten, but with the two sides unable to agree on whether the elderly should be given a legal minimum of home-care standards, including a weekly bath and an annual spring-cleaning. 

SEE RELATED:  Budget negotiations coming down to wire

Enhedslisten had made the standards a key demand, while the government hoped that additional funding to the tune of 1 billion kroner would be enough to shore up declining quality of care. 

The increased funding, as well as funding to prevent firms from underpaying foreign employees, another key Enhedslisten demand, made it into the budget, as did new business initiative, an opposition demand.

With the December 2 deadline for reaching deal approaching, Corydon chose to sat down with the opposition for the first time since October 30. 

Had the minority coalition government not come up with a draft budget 30 days before the end of the year, it would have been forced to call an election. 

SEE RELATED: War of nerves over budget (Morning Briefing – Monday, November 25)

Before the deal was struck, it was speculated that Enhedslisten, fresh of sweeping electoral gains in local elections, would withdraw its support for the government if came to an agreement with the opposition, requiring an election to be called. 

In a press conference after the budget deal was announced, Johanne Schmidt-Nielsen, the party’s leader, however, ruled out such a move. 

“The government made its choice,” she said. “They’d rather pass tax cuts together with the right-wing. Of course we disagree with their politics.”

Factfile | Proposed 2014 budget highlights
– 800 million kroner for tax cuts originally planned for 2015
– 1 billion kroner annual to improve eldercare between 2014 and 2017
– 1.5 billion kroner to implement sustainable energy technologies, fund new nature initiatives and help pay for construction of a light rail in Odense


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”