118

Politics

Trust in former PM plummets following ‘Luxury Lars’ scandal

admin
November 18th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Venstre leader Lars Løkke Rasmussen still has questions to answer about his salary at climate organisation GGGI and how it ‘accidentally’ ended up paying for his daughter’s flights

The relentless stream of bad press directed at Venstre leader Lars Løkke Rasmussen has greatly damaged his reputation.

Rasmussen has gone from being viewed as the most trustworthy party leader to the least trustworthy in under a year, according to a new study carried out by Wilke for Jyllands-Posten newspaper. 

But the bad news isn't just limited to 'Luxury Lars'; Venstre too has taken a beating in the wake of the scandal. The party has lost almost all of the ground it gained following the 2011 election. Venstre is now polling at around 26 percent after peaking at around 34 percent last year.

READ MORE: Problems won't go away for 'Luxury Lars'

Fallout of a scandal
The ‘Luxury Lars’ saga started when Ekstra Bladet tabloid revealed that Rasmussen spent 770,000 kroner on first-class flights as the chairman of climate organisation GGGI, which is funded with 90 million kroner of Danish taxpayer funds.

Rasmussen has been on damage control ever since and despite a four-hour press conference in which he apologised for his wrongdoings and laid out his costs as GGGI chairman, the story simply won’t die.

Censored GGGI fee
In an attempt to find out what Rasmussen earned as GGGI chairman, Berlingske newspaper submitted a freedom of information request to the agency for modernising public administrations, Moderniseringstyrelsen. The newspaper was subsequently given an email from Rasmussen, in which he outlined the salaries he has received as a member of various boards since losing the post of prime minister in 2011.

But while the email revealed that Rasmussen received an annual 30,000 kroner salary as chairman of the LøkkeFonden and 22,231.82 kroner as a board member for Nationalbanken, Moderniseringstyrelsen censored the sum he received from GGGI.

The agency said it censored the salary because private economic matters are exempt from freedom of information requests. As a result, the public remains in the dark about how much Rasmussen earned while flying first class around the world.

Mysterious flights for daughter
Rasmussen also remains under scrutiny for his explanation for how GGGI came to pay 27,000 kroner for his daughter’s flights from Chicago to Copenhagen via Rio de Janeiro.

Rasmussen has maintained that it was a mistake that GGGI paid for the flights and he paid the organisation back as soon as it was revealed.

But according to Ekstra Bladet tabloid, GGGI has admitted to finding an email correspondence in which the flights for Rasmussen’s daughter are discussed, though neither GGGI nor Rasmussen have yet released any documentation on how the flights were paid for.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”