207

Sport

Party profile: Liberal Alliance

admin
November 9th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Lars Berg Dueholm is not a fan of spending other people’s money and wants lower and fewer taxes

Running a business in Copenhagen should be easier argues Lars Berg Dueholm, the mayoral candidate for Liberal Alliance – a classic libertarian and small government party. Speaking to The Copenhagen Post from his office on Havnegade where he operates a legal practice, Dueholm is annoyed that the city doesn’t focus more of its energy on improving the conditions for businesses that provide the city with its tax revenue.

“We can’t all be students or unemployed or retired,” Dueholm said. “We need people who get up and go to work and pay their taxes. And these people need a place to go to work.”

He points to a study by the industry lobby group Dansk Industry that ranked Copenhagen’s business climate in 2013 as the 86th worst out of the 98 councils in Denmark – a drop of 16 places from the year before.

He offers a few solutions. Firstly, the City Council needs to become more service-minded and helpful when engaging with businesses. He also wants fewer and lower taxes on businesses and points out that LA was instrumental in abolishing fees on cafes and restaurants that want to serve food and drink outside.

SEE ALSO: Party profile: Enhedslisten

Anti-car policies hurt business
Dueholm is particularly critical of the current administration’s transport policies, which have seen an increase in parking fees and a focus on public transport and cycling. These anti-car policies, he argues, makes life difficult for businesses – particularly those whose clients want to drive to the city for appointments.
“It’s a self-inflicted problem,” Dueholm said, adding that traffic restrictions such as lane closures have increased congestion in the city centre despite there being fewer cars.

“The left-wing parties have specifically targeted reducing the number of cars in the city and they’ve succeeded. But we’ve been left with fewer cars and more congestion. I don’t simply want to increase the number of cars, I want to accommodate car traffic and ensure that people can get from A to B.”

Schools need work
The poor academic achievement of the city’s school children also spells trouble for the city’s future, he argues.

“It’s a huge problem for both the city and the students when 20 to 25 percent complete school aged 16 as functional illiterates,” Dueholm said.

“They are left with bleak prospects for the rest of their lives and, while it’s sad for them, it’s sad for us as a council and as taxpayers because these are young people who are left to social welfare or crime.”

His solution is increased discipline and better school leadership. The latter, he argues, can be achieved by allowing councils to appoint school leaders and hand them more power to hire and fire teachers according to their performance.

Dueholm is a big fan of international schools and international university students because they help the city’s businesses. International schools are needed to educate the children of highly-skilled foreigners, and international students who enjoy their time here may return with needed investment in the future.

City should spend wiser
If he had the power he would make deep cuts to the public sector and reduce taxes. One area is in unemployment services where, he argues, the city goes well beyond its legal obligations. By cutting some of these services the city could reduce taxes that would in turn make businesses better equipped to create the jobs the unemployed need in the first place.

But there are easier savings to make, he argues, pointing out that Copenhagen could save a billion kroner a year if it spent as efficiently as the average council.

“That’s a billion that could be used on tax cuts that would give us the lowest income tax in Denmark. That would really attract a lot of people and business to Copenhagen and strengthen it as a whole,” Dueholm said.

“Sweden has had success over the past few years stimulating growth by using tax cuts, and we should follow the same path instead of spending other people’s money on our own pet projects,” he said.

Factfile | Lars Berg Dueholm
Party: Liberal Alliance
Age: 36
Years on the City Council: 5

Platform
• Reduce taxes
• Better business environment
• Better schools
• Better traffic conditions
• A more international city


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”