125

Politics

Auditors can examine government’s role into failed solar panel law

admin
November 6th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Speaker of parliament tells PM that regulators have the right to look into the developments that lead up to the creation of a costly solar panel law

The government cannot keep state auditors from examining issues surrounding problems with a failed solar panel law that resulted in an official reprimand for the climate minister.

After a meeting this morning, Mogens Lykketoft (S), speaker of the parliament, said auditors with Rigsrevisionen will pursue their investigation as planned.

PM Helle Thorning-Schmidt (S) and three of her leading cabinet members, finance minister Bjarne Corydon (S), economy minister Margrethe Vestager (R), and social affairs minister Annette Vilhelmsen (SF), had sent a letter to Lykketoft saying they did not intend to answer questions or turn over documents to the auditors examining the discussions that led up to the legislation.

Lykketoft said he had examined the legalities involved and wrote his own letter to the prime minister stating that the public accounting office and the national auditor were independent entities over which he had no jurisdiction.

The original letter from the four ministers kicked off a massive wave of criticism of the government and accusations of a cover up.

Thorning-Schmidt and Corydon said the letter was not intended to obscure that facts, just ensure what they called a “principled discussion” about whether auditors should have access to the preparatory work that went into the drafting of legislation.

"We have not said we will not co-operate with the auditor general,” Thorning-Schmidt said in a press conference last week. “We just want to raise a discussion about what they should have access to.”

A messy case
The questions in the case focused on the climate minister, Martin Lidegaard (R), and laws his ministry created to promote solar energy by providing generous incentives for selling surplus energy back to the grid.

Late last year, the Climate Ministry realised that the declining price of solar panels, combined with the lucrative sell-back scheme, resulted in the number of solar panel installations rising more than ten-fold, from 5,000 at the start of the year to 70,000 by the year’s end.

The ministry then passed a law aimed at limiting the number of solar installations. The law, however, turned out to have a number of loopholes, including one that allowed large subsidised installations to be placed in agricultural fields. Lidegaard closed the loophole earlier this year, but he received an official reprimand after Berlingske newspaper exposed that he had been informed of the loophole before the law was passed.

Lykketoft said today’s letter to Thorning-Schmidt should in no way be considered a reprimand.

He also said that, separate from problems with the solar panel laws, the relationship between the government and national auditors would be examined.

“Everyone agrees that Rigsrevisionen should not review the political negotiations over a bill and everyone agrees if a case concerns a minister or official being accused of wrongdoing, then an investigative commission is the natural instrument of inquiry,” Lykketoft told Politiken newspaper.

Corydon regrets
At the time of the original letter, Corydon said the ministers were within their rights to refuse to respond to questioning.

“If standards are going to be set that evaluates all of the work done before a minister submits a bill to parliament, that they then have every opportunity to examine and reject, you are creating a new step in the way we make laws in Denmark,” Corydon told Politiken.

He now admits that the letter and subsequent handling of the government’s position were clumsy at best.

“It is obvious that it has not benefitted either the government or to myself as a representative of the government,” he said at a press conference held today at the Finance Ministry.

Corydon acknowledged the situation had led to questions about whether the government was trying to hide something from the public.

“That, of course, is a shame.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”