163

Politics

Problems just won’t go away for ‘Luxury Lars’

admin
November 5th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Forgotten travel expense allowances and confusion surrounding his daughter’s stay in Rio are the latest troubles for the former prime minister

The embattled opposition leader, Lars Løkke Rasmussen (V), can’t seem to dig himself out of the hole he has been in since it was revealed that he had spent close to 800,000 kroner on first-class tickets while head of the Global Green Growth Initiative (GGGI), a taxpayer-funded climate organisation.

New developments in the case find the former prime minister being accused of not telling the truth while apologising at a press conference on October 20 when he said that he had not received any payment from GGGI in 2012.

“Just to be clear, I have not received any kind of fee or allowance or anything else from GGGI in 2012,” Rasmussen said at the press conference.

READ MORE: 'Luxury Lars’ down, but not out after travel expense apology

Forgot about travel expenses
Berlingske newspaper went through the documentation of his travel expenses and revealed over the weekend that Rasmussen had in fact received 8,784.50 kroner from GGGI in daily expense allowances in 2012 in connection with his business trips as chairman of GGGI.

That information was confirmed by a GGGI spokesperson, Mike Sullivan, who informed Berlingske that Rasmussen had indeed received allowance payments in 2012 in accordance with GGGI protocol.

This forced Rasmussen to once again explain himself, and he maintained that his remarks about not receiving anything from GGGI in 2012 were based on his best recollection. 

“When I held that press conference and showed 206 pages of documentation, it was on my own initiative in order to be completely open about it, so it’s not like I’ve hidden something under my chair,” Rasmussen told DR Nyheder.

Taxes not paid
Another problem for Rasmussen is that he hasn’t paid taxes on the per diem income.

The total 8,784.50 kroner in daily expense allowances given to Rasmussen by GGGI in 2012 was spread out over a number of days, so he received, on average, 675 kroner per day. But according to the tax authorities, the maximum amount of daily expense allowances that one can receive without a tax penalty is 455 kroner.

"According to my accountant, Deloitte, I paid too much in tax in 2012 – even with my expense allowances factored in – so we are working on sorting that out now,” Rasmussen told DR Nyheder.

Excuses galore
But Rasmussen’s latest round of excuses doesn’t sit well with Pernille Rosenkrantz-Theil, a spokesperson for Socialdemokraterne.

”You have to be careful or you may become dizzy and disorientated by all these continuously changing explanations,” Rosenkrantz-Theil told DR Nyheder. 

Aside from his expense allowances, there is also confusion surrounding who paid for Rasmussen’s daughter’s hotel stay during one of his GGGI trips to Rio de Janeiro in June 2012.

Venstre has reportedly tried to keep the issue under wraps, but there are indications that the party coffers, and therefore Venstre party members, covered the costs of his daughter’s two-day stay in the Brazilian capital even though she was not there on party business.

That revelation comes in the wake of documentation from GGGI that showed that the organisation initially paid 27,000 kroner for her airplane ticket to Rio. Rasmussen said he had tried to repay his daughter’s ticket before, but a miscommunication prevented the payment from being made. 

READ MORE: Rasmussen pays for his daughter's flights

Brutalised in the polls
The entire scandal has had a drastic effect on Venstre and Rasmussen’s popularity in the polls and with the local elections coming up in two weeks, the timing has been impeccable for the opposition, particularly Socialdemokraterne.

While Venstre has dropped 2.4 percent in the polls to 26.7 percent since September, according to Altinget.dk, Socialdemokraterne gained three percent and are now up to 21.6 percent.

Rasmussen has taken a personal beating in the polls as well. An Epinion survey from last week showed that just 30 percent of the population had a positive opinion about Rasmussen, down from 60 percent a year ago.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”