96

Politics

Councils hiding party donors

admin
October 7th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Political parties are rejecting freedom of information requests about their donors at the council level, arguing it would be a breach of their duty of confidentiality

Political parties are using a loophole to hide the names of their financial backers at the council level, reports Jyllands-Posten newspaper.

A 1995 law requires that political parties have to publish the names of donors who contribute more than 20,000 kroner. But according to the Ministry of Economy and the Interior, councils are not obliged to publish the names of private donors because they have a duty of confidentiality not to share personal information.

Small donation, big impact
Jyllands-Posten reports that seven councils have made use of these conflicting laws to refuse to answer freedom of information requests regarding the identity of private individuals who have donated over 20,000 kroner.

The revelation has bewildered experts in the field, given that a 20,000 kroner donation could make a big impact on the election of a local official who has the power to award contracts.

READ MORE: Left and right squabble over party funding

“There is a greater need for transparency here, so it can seem paradoxical that there is no right for freedom of information requests on the local level, when there is regarding political parties on the national level,” Oluf Jørgensen, a transparency expert and head of research at the Danish School of Media and Journalism, told Jyllands-Posten.

Law professor Jørgen Albæk from the University of Aarhus agrees with Jørgensen’s appraisal.

Cheap influence
“On a national level, you probably need far greater sums of money before you can have an influence, but on a local level a donation between 50,000 and 100,000 kroner could have an impact on personal relationships,” Albæk told Jyllands-Posten.

The politicians who make up Copenhagen City Council have taken advantage of the opportunity to hide the identity of donors to the parties Socialdemokraterne, Socialistisk Folkeparti and Enhedslisten.

Journalists have complained that their freedom of information requests have been turned down.

While the complaints are being handled by her ministry, the economy and interior minister, Margrethe Vestager (Radikale), said she could not comment on the issue.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”