98

Politics

Light rails, trains and fewer automobiles

admin
September 26th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

A summary of the much debated ‘Trængselsrapport’

If you haven’t had the time to read through the 200 page report (in Danish) put forward by the government committee charged with coming up with ways to improve mobility in Copenhagen, here are some of the highlights.

If all of the Trængselskommission’s proposals were put into effect, they would cost 42 billion kroner.

SEE RELATED: Transport minister dismisses road pricing

For that, commuters and everyone else who moves about the city would get better infrastructure and faster travel times.

As it stands, 100,000 more people will be living in Greater Copenhagen by 2025. If no changes are made to the region’s traffic infrastructure, the amount of time wasted by commuters will double, to over 18 million hours annually, by 2025. 

Cars out of city centre 
Like in many other big cities, Copenhagen has many people crammed together in a little amount of space. There are limited opportunities to make changes, so the commission recommends focusing on improving what is already there. That means better cycleways, an improved signal system and fewer cars.

By leading car traffic out on the bigger main roads, there will be fewer cars on the narrower streets of the city centre, making more room for bikes and buses.

In addition the commission also recommends building a Metro station at Ny Ellebjerg Station, in south-western Copenhagen. Ny Ellebjerg is in the outskirts of the city but will play a central role as a key transfer point as public transport ridership increases.

Suburban solution
The ring of councils surrounding Copenhagen has the same number of inhabitants as Copenhagen proper, but it is less densely populated.

The commission proposed establishing a light rail line in these communities. In the places with less traffic, they suggest introducing express buses.

Like in the city centre, bicycles play a key role in the outskirts. Without bicycles, congestion problems would be even worse, and the commission sees potential in expanding the so-called bike superhighways to include all of Greater Copenhagen. These are direct routes that can make it more attractive for commuters to bike instead of drive.

Transport corridors need a helping hand
Regional traffic has long been planned according to the ‘five-finger principle’. With Copenhagen serving as the palm, five traffic corridors extended outwards towards the north and west. 

Now, a sixth finger has been added, this one stretching east, towards Malmö. 

By expanding S-train and regional train services and updating the signalling system, the commission expects to reduce motorway traffic. Congestion is worst during rush hour on parts of the Helsingør, Frederikssund and Hillerød motorways, and the commission suggests expanding only the stretches that are most congested.

Less air pollution, but environment is no winner
The investment is projected to reduce car traffic to 37,000 daily trips and would move 70,000 people onto bikes or into buses and trains.

To make the different public transport services more flexible, the commission brought up the idea of merging existing transport companies into a single entity. That would make it easier for passengers to combine different transport forms. In addition, rates should be adjusted based on customer group and time of the day travelled.

While less cars and more bikes and public transport would be expected to reduce noise and air pollution considerably, carbon dioxide emissions would increase by 1 percent. Reducing emissions would require the government to invest in new sustainable technologies. 

Pay-as-you-go is a no-go
The investment is ambitious, but the commission calculates that council, regional and state authorities, together with private firms, should be able to fund the project.

One problem could be the government’s rejection of road pricing. Charging motorists to pay per kilometre they drive would, firstly, encourage people to drive less, and, secondly, generate revenue that could be invested into other forms of transport. That option is now off limits, at least until the technology for doing so is readily available. 

Until that happens, area decision makers will have 200-pages worth of other suggestions they can pick from.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”