110

Business

No uranium, no investments, mining company tells Greenlanders

admin
September 25th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Mining interests warn that it is up to the Greenlandic parliament to secure the country’s industrial future

Greenland’s parliament could cost the country billions of kroner in investments if it does not vote to lift the self-governing territory’s 25-year-old ban on mining radioactive materials, according to Roderick McIllree, the managing director of Greenland Mining and Energy (GME).

GME has spent 450 billion kroner in the past five years on a successful exploration of the Greenlandic underground near the southern town of Narsaq. The company says it has discovered the largest deposit of rare earth minerals outside of China. The series of minerals is vital to modern devices from cell phones to satellite systems.

The company is being funded by South Korean investors who are willing to invest billions of kroner in the uranium mine, which has the potential to create as many as 800 permanent, year-round jobs in an area hard hit by unemployment. The uranium mine would also contribute one billion kroner in annual revenues for Greenland's national treasury.

An historic vote
Greenland’s parliament is expected to vote on October 24 to decide whether the extraction of radioactive substances will be permitted.

Many foreign mining groups, encouraged by Greenland’s investment-friendly policies, have already spent billions of kroner developing potential projects. If permission is granted, a mine could open as early as 2016.

John Mair, the GME executive director, told the Wall Street Journal that ending the ban would be “a dynamic point in Greenland’s history, politically, economically and culturally”. 

Still need permission from Denmark
Greenland’s parliament is expected to vote to overturn the ban, but that is only the first step in Greenland beginning to export uranium.

While Greenland’s self-rule government has domain over the country’s natural resources – including uranium – Denmark still has responsibility for its foreign affairs and defence.

And due to uranium’s security significance, it had long been thought, that Denmark would need to agree to permit uranium exports.

However, a recent report commissioned by Greenland’s government said that the country has complete sovereignty over commodities trading, including for uranium, which is regulated by international treaties on non-nuclear proliferation.

Although Greenland is free to sell the metal on the international market, the report states that Nuuk must co-operate with Copenhagen in order to ensure compliance with international conventions preventing the production of nuclear weapons.

Nils Wang, the chief of the Royal Danish Defence College, told Politiken newspaper that Denmark has created a committee to determine what foreign policy consequences might arise should Greenland decide to export uranium.

Negotiations between the two continue, but no agreement appears to be on the horizon.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”