80

Politics

Embassy realignment should follow commercial potential, trade minister argues

admin
September 24th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Foreign Ministry working group looking at Denmark’s representation should focus closely on where the money is

Denmark should realign its diplomatic representation abroad so that the foreign service can first and foremost promote the country’s commercial interests, according to the trade and European affairs minister, Nick Hækkerup (Socialdemokraterne).

Hækkerup admitted that changes might result in the closing of some embassies, but added that the realignment was a way to give what he called “priority to Denmark”. His ultimate goal is to make sure that the country is represented in countries with trade and economic opportunities. 

“What matters is that we are present where there are new markets and opportunities to sell Danish products,” Hækkerup told DR Nyheder. “This means that we would close in some countries.”

Location, location, location

Hækkerup declined to state which embassies were on the hitlist, deferring instead to a Foreign Ministry workgroup set up to develop a blueprint for how and where Denmark would be represented in the world.

“When the world changes and new places become open to Danish products, it is in our best interest to be there,” he said. “When we sell our goods around the world, we create jobs at home.”

Denmark currently maintains embassies in 74 countries. In addition, its interests are represented by consulates and trade and representative offices in a number of other countries. These diplomatic offices also provide services and assistance to Danish citizens and potential immigrants.

Diplomatic drought feared

Leaders from both ends of the political spectrum have expressed their opposition to Hækkerup’s vision.

“If we want to increase trade, you aren’t just represented in those places where you are already doing business, you need to extend into new places and find new markets,” Søren Espersen, the foreign affairs spokesperson for the right-wing Dansk Folkeparti, told DR Nyheder.

Espersen found support from his counterpart on the far-left.

“We should be represented in more countries, rather than fewer, if we are to make our mark in the global marketplace,” said Christian Juhl, the Enhedslisten foreign affairs spokesperson.

Hækkerup denied that closing embassies would create problems.

“It is first and foremost most important to be represented in the right places,” he said.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”