95

Politics

Opposition: cut taxes and development aid

admin
September 6th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Government unimpressed by opposition demand to cut 2.5 billion kroner a year from the aid budget and reduce the size of the public to pay for tax cuts

Opposition leaders Venstre want to pay for tax cuts by slashing Denmark’s 16 billion kroner aid budget by 2.5 billion kroner.

Denmark currently gives 0.83 percent of its GDP in aid but today Venstre leader Lars Løkke Rasmussen proposed cutting it back to 0.7 percent.

“In the middle of a recession and declining competitiveness, we don’t think it is the time overly generous targets,” Rasmussen said at a press conference today, pointing out that no other country pays out as much aid as a proportion of their GDP as Denmark does.

Targeting aid on Africans and refugees
Venstre calculates that if the government maintains its target of raising development aid to one percent of GDP by 2020, it would wind up spending an extra seven billion kroner.

Rasmussen called for a more targeted approach to giving aid and that the 24 countries currently classified as priority recipients of aid should be reduced and the focus put mainly on African countries.

Venstre also wants to invest more in helping refugees and asylum seekers closer to the sites of conflict in the hope of reducing the rising cost of housing asylum seekers in Denmark – a billion-kroner bill paid using development aid.

“[If] we were better at helping refugees near the conflict [we would] be able to help more as well as helping those refugees who are too weak to take make the long journey to Denmark,” Vesntre write in its proposal.

Today’s proposal was made as part of the run up to negotiations over the 2014 budget. Venstre want to cut taxes by five billion kroner next year in a bid to create jobs.

READ MORE: 2014 budget to focus on public-sector investment

While some of those savings could be made from cutting aid, the party says one billion could be saved by sending more council services to tender. Further savings could be made by limiting public sector growth.

Government unimpressed
The government is less than impressed by Venstre’s proposals, however.

“Venstre has once again failed to illustrate exactly what freezing public sector growth means, namely cutting 33,000 jobs by 2020,” Jonas Dahl, a spokesperson for Socialistisk Folkeparti, said in a press release.

Socialdemokraterne also expressed scepticism, arguing that Venstre was electioneering, rather than making sensible proposals for next year’s budget.

“Wanting to cut taxes is fair enough, but then we need an honest answer of what it will cost,” Jesper Petersen, Socialdemokraterne finance spokesperson, told Jyllands-Posten. “The fact is it will mean fewer public sector employees and we won’t be able to afford certain things. For example, improving hospitals, education and the efforts to tackle gang crime, just as the government is proposing.”

“Populist and irresponsible”

Development minister Christian Friis Bach, Radikale, also condemned the proposal to cut foreign aid.

“It’s both populist and irresponsible to save on poor people who can’t vote in Denmark,” Bach told the Ritzau news bureau. “Venstre needs to answer whether it is Syrian refugees, Afghan school children or poor women in Mozambique who will pay for our tax cuts.”

He added that helping developing economies could ultimately stimulate growth in Denmark and the rest of the world.

“We are not going to leave the recession by shutting ourselves in and the world out,” Bach said. “We will leave the recession behind us by engaging with the world and contributing to solving the world’s big problems, from conflicts to climate change.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”