95

Politics

Concern that nation’s children were the losers in cabinet reshuffle

admin
August 12th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Responsibility for young children was moved from the Education Ministry to the Social Affairs Ministry, which critics argue is already over-burdened

Young children may be the biggest losers of the government’s cabinet reshuffle late last week

Responsibility for children aged 0-6 was moved from the Education Ministry to the Ministry of Social Affairs and Immigration. Young children traditionally fell under the social affairs umbrella before the current government moved the area to the Education Ministry after taking power in the autumn of 2011.

Critics argue that Social Affairs Ministry is already burdened with providing specialist services for at-risk or needy groups and that young children won’t receive the attention that they need.

“I am very surprised that they are moving responsibility for young children only a few years after establishing the new Children and Education Ministry.” Henning Pedersen, the chairman of the nursery teacher’s union, wrote in a press release. “After giving them greater priority in the former Children and Education Ministry, we now risk that they will be drowned between social problems, specialised social services and immigration politics.”

The government made a big deal out of moving responsibility for young children to the Education Ministry in 2011, arguing that it would create more streamlined and integrated policies for young people.

Speaking to Politiken newspaper, Andreas Rasch-Christensen from VIA University College in Aarhus argued that the new decision to move the responsibility for children again was entirely political.

“There are no professional arguments for splitting up [the fields],” he said. “We had finally received support for the idea that learning is a natural part of school, nurseries and daycares. This goes in the opposite direction.”

The government is made up of three parties – the Socialdemokraterne (S), Socialistisk Folkeparti (SF) and Radikale – whose MPs are distributed between the 24 ministerial roles .

Annette Vilhelmsen (SF) was made the minister for business and growth after taking over as SF leader from Villy Søvndal, the foreign minister. The fit was never quite right, however, and according to Politiken, Vilhelmsen had been pushing to take over the Education Ministry from Christina Antorini (Socialdemokraterne).

S was unwilling to part with the ministry, however, and instead Vilhelmsen took over the Social Affairs Ministry from Karen Hækkerup (S) and was given the additional responsibility for young children up to the age of six.

The decision has split the government and a number of leading S members have expressed concern that the ministry would become over-burdened – an argument also voiced by far-left support party Enhedslisten (EL).

“I am very worried that responsibility for children will be drowned under the specialist services and integration cases,” Rosa Lund (EL) told Politiken.

In a written comment to Politiken newspaper, Vilhelmsen attempted to reassure critics that her new ministry would be capable of managing its remit.

“I am especially concerned with ensuring that all children are given the best opportunities for a good start in life,” she wrote. “I will work closely with my ministerial colleague Christine Antorini, the association of local councils (KL) and other actors in the field of helping young children.”

Attacking the issue from another angle, Pia Kjærsgaard from Dansk Folkeparti argued that immigration issues won’t get the attention it deserves within the new structure.

“I have never heard that Annette Vilhelmsen was interested in immigration politics,” Kjærsgaard told Ritzau. ”I am concerned that Annette Vilhelmsen won’t be able to handle it and will treat it as a secondary issue.”

Hoping to silence the criticism, PM Helle Thorning-Schmidt explained that the decision wouldn’t impact the work that is done in any of the fields.

“It’s important to remember that even though something falls under one ministry, it can still easily be discussed across a government and that’s what we will do,” Thorning-Schmidt said. “Young children can sit in [both ministries]. We have moved them to the Social Affairs Ministry because we want to focus on marginalised children. But that doesn’t change the fact that we have to co-operate on all issues facing our youngest children.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”