83

Politics

Calls for more transparent party financing ahead of local election

admin
June 21st, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Far-left party Enhedslisten reveals its budget for the 2013 local election campaign in Copenhagen and wants other parties to do the same

Political financing needs to become more transparent argues far-left party Enhedslisten (EL), which has published its campaign budget for the 2013 council election in Copenhagen and has urged other parties to follow suit.

Political spokesperson Johanne Schmidt-Nielsen (EL) made the call last Friday at the  political gathering, Folkemødet, on Bornholm. There she chastised the government for not living up to its campaign promise of improving the transparency of party financing.

“The government has been in power for almost two years,” Schmidt-Nielsen said. “But nothing has happened yet. That worries us because I doubt we will get greater openness about party financing if [leader of the opposition party Venstre] Lars Løkke [Rasmussen] wins the next election.”

EL has announced that it intends to put forth a proposal to require political donations of 5,000 kroner or more, including non-cash gifts to local chapters, to be published in party accounts along with donors’ names. The current maximum anonymous sum is 20,000 kroner.

EL pointed to a study by Ugebrevet A4 that revealed how private political donations rose from around 49.7 million kroner in 2005 to 82.3 million kroner in 2011 – three-quarters of the 2011 donations were given to centre-right parties.

“The least we can demand is full transparency and that voters can see who is paying for party adverts and how large the cheques are,” Schmidt-Nielsen said. “I don’t think that's too much to demand in a democracy.”

Yesterday, EL in Copenhagen published the details of their entire budget for the 2013 local election and encouraged political rivals to follow suit.

The party reported having 1,620,000 kroner available for the election to pay for posters, printed material and the salary of a campaign secretary for 12 months.

“There is a need for greater transparency about how much money the parties have for the election and where the money comes from,” Morten Kabell, EL’s leading candidate in the November’s election, stated in a press release. “Our challenge goes out to everyone but particularly to Pia Allerlsev (Venstre) and Rasmus Jarlov (Konservative) who are running for parties which normally receive a lot of financial support.”

Kabell added that it was particularly important for these parties to publish their list of donors given their historic close connection to business.

Allerslev, a deputy mayor and Venstre’s mayoral candidate for the 2013 elections, replied that her party had no plans to release details about its supporters, but she expected its budget to be no greater than one million kroner.

“I think that if someone wants to support me or Venstre’s campaign and wants to publicise it, then that’s their own responsibility,” Allerslev told Politiken newspaper. “I’m not entitled to release that information.”

Jarlov, the Konservativ candidate for mayor, welcomed calls for more openness.

“Historically we have been supported by businesses but with nothing that comes close to the amount that the left-wing receives from trade unions,” Jarlov told Politiken. “There are many myths about how money controls politics. If more transparency can help counter these myths, then I have no problem with it. If other parties follow suit, we will consider it.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”