176

Business

Lundbeck fined 700mn kr for blocking generic drugs

admin
June 19th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Copenhagen drugmaker one of nine companies facing EU levies for blocking the supply of cheaper anti-depressants to the market

The pharmaceutical company Lundbeck has been slapped with a 700 million kroner fine for violating EU anti-trust regulations.

Lundbeck’s participation in a 2002 scheme to delay generic versions of its anti-depressant drug Citalopram from coming into the marketplace earned it the largest EU fine ever levied against a Danish firm.

A 2009 report by the European Commission on the pharmaceutical sector, said that ‘pay-for-delay’ agreements between Lundbeck and the other companies involved led to consumers paying as much as 20 percent more for their medicines.

Pay-for-delay agreements involve brand-name firms paying producers of low-cost generic drugs not to market rival versions of their products.

In Lundbeck’s case the drug in question was Citalopram, one of the world’s most widely prescribed anti-depressants, and the company’s primary product.

"Agreements of this type hurt patients and national health systems, which are already under tight budgetary constraints," the EU competition commissioner, Joaquin Almunia, told media. "The commission will not tolerate such anti-competitive practices."

Internal documents uncovered during the investigation mentioned a ‘club’ that facilitated the transfer of large amounts of money among members. Lundbeck paid significant amounts to buy up and destroy competitors’ inventories of generic medications.

Generic manufacturers who were in on the scheme were also fined by the commission. Lundbeck said it would appeal the decision but has downgraded its predicted operating profits for the year as a result of the fine.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”