87

Politics

Venstre “flip-flops” on university fees

admin
June 12th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

It took less than a day for the opposition party to retract a demand that a commission examine the impact of introducing university fees

It was a short-lived affair. Yesterday morning opposition party Venstre called on the government to set up a committee to examine the possibility of making people pay for their education.

But by the afternoon following a media uproar they had already got cold feet and announced that they didn't want to take a look at student fees after all.

“Venstre is not proposing introducing education fees,” Venstre’s parliamentary group leader Kristian Jensen told Berlingske newspaper. “Our proposal was to establish a commission to broadly examine [how the government pays for tuition]. One of the five points was to take a look at the pros and cons of introducing fees. We never decided that we wanted to introduce fees and we have not changed or policies. We still do not want to introduce fees. And now I don’t want it to be investigated.”

Jensen added that the reason for the turnaround was because the media debate made it sound like Venstre was interested in introducing fees, which you’d be forgiven for thinking after reading what Venstre’s further education spokesperson, Esben Lunde Hansen, told Berlingske yesterday.

“You’d have to be blind not to see that fees create a positive incentive structure,” Hansen said. “Of course there is a risk that introducing fees could hurt some groups, but it could also ensure that students finish faster and are more focused.”

The government earlier this year completed a reform of the SU student grant system, which was designed to find savings by encouraging students to complete their further education more quickly.

Danes and some EU residents are entitled to six years of SU payments, as well as free tuition, resulting in a generous system that Hansen yesterday argued ought to be the subject of discussion.

Jensen took this off the table, but added that Venstre still wanted a commission to examine how the government pays for education.

Magnus Heunicke, political spokesperson for the PM's Socialdemokraterne, criticised Venstre and its leader Lars Løkke Rasmussen for their “flip-flop”.

“Now Lars Løkke needs to tell Danish families what politics they can rely upon from Venstre,” Heunicke told Politiken newspaper, adding that no educational fees would be introduced by the Socialdemokraterne government.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”