95

Business

Bad medicine for Novo Nordisk

admin
June 10th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Squeaky-clean company hit by a complicated tax case and accusations that one of its most promising drugs may be causing cancer

One of Denmark's most trusted companies has taken some hard shots to its corporate image over the past few weeks.

Novo Nordisk, the country's most valuable company, has consistently been at the top of consumer confidence studies since the 1990s, but according to new revelations the drug maker is avoiding taxes in its home country.

According to public broadcaster DR, tax authority Skat is demanding that Novo Nordisk pay 5.5 billion kroner in back taxes, claiming that Novo Nordisk dodged taxes by funnelling billions of kroner into tax havens in Switzerland.

Although the case is complicated, the allegations boil down to Novo Nordisk, between 2002 and 2007, registering patents and other rights for several of its products to subsidiaries in Switzerland, thus avoiding higher Danish tax rates.

"It is a classic example of aggressive tax avoidance," Swiss tax expert Andreas Missbach from the Berne Declaration, a think tank, told DR News.

Skat has declined to comment, but according to DR News, they believe Novo Nordisk under-reported the value of the products and rights it assigned in Switzerland to the tune of 22 billion kroner.

"I find it hard to see how their image can escape unscathed,” Anders Drejer, a management professor from Aalborg University, told DR News.

Although Skat recently went after US software giant Microsoft for 5.8 billion kroner, the case against Novo Nordisk is thought to be the largest ever filed against a Danish company.

"It is a huge case,” Lars Kiertzner, a professor from the Copenhagen Business School, told DR News.

Some business experts have pointed out that Novo Nordisk is simply following standard business procedure, and Drejer added that Skat’s poor reputation could play in Novo Nordisk’s favour. Even so, he said the company was still likely to slip a notch in the public’s eye.

“They have always been such a leader when it comes to ethics that it  looks extra bad when it appears they cannot live up to them. Danes have a tendency to gloat a little in cases like this,” he said.

The Tax Ministry has vowed to track down corporate tax cheats to collect what it said were hundreds of billions of kroner in unpaid taxes.

Novo Nordisk contended that it had done nothing wrong.

"I would like to make it clear: Novo Nordisk does not cheat on its taxes either in Denmark or in any other country. We pay the taxes that we owe," finance director Jesper Brandgaard told DR News. "We pay more coporate taxes than anyone else in Denmark."

Brandgaard said that Novo Nordisk had registered part of its businesses in Zurich because of the strong pharma environment and becuase "it is a fantastic place to do business."

Accusations of tax fraud however, are just the first of Novo Nordisk's worries at the moment.

Reports surfaced that its successful diabetes drug Victoza may increase the chance of users developing pancreatic cancer.

Authorities in both Europe and the US have found evidence of the increased risk.

A report in the British Medical Journal said that incidences of pancreatic cancers were “over-represented” in patients who used glucose-lowering medications like Victoza.

The European Medicines Agency stressed that incidences of cancer being over-represented in the statistics of reported side effects is not the same as saying that there is a direct relationship between the drug and the development of cancer.

"This is especially true for signs of malignant cancers that are extremely difficult to confirm solely on the basis of spontaneous reports,” an EMA representative wrote to Berlingske newspaper.

Novo Nordisk head of research Mads Krogsgaard Thomsen told Berlingske that the company's own experiments on animals and humans and subsequent monitoring of data has found no evidence that Victoza increased the risk of pancreatic cancer.

Novo Nordisk shares took a hit earlier this year when two of its drugs were rejected for sale in the US. The company has also been involved in overtime disputes with some of  its US employees.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”