90

Business

Doubt over North Sea oil and gas revenue

admin
April 30th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Government expects new tax rules to raise additional 27.5 billion from North Sea oil and gas but a consultancy firm calculates that only half this amount may be realised

Profits from North Sea oil and gas may be far lower than the government’s prediction, putting a planned investment in rail infrastructure at risk.

In March, the government announced that it was harmonising the taxation rules for North Sea oil companies in a move that was expected to generate 27.5 billion kroner of extra income before 2042.

Those extra billions have been allocated to upgrading Denmark’s rail infrastructure and reducing travel times between the country's major cities.

But according to Jyllands-Posten newspaper, the consultancy firm Wood Mackenzie has now calculated that the government will earn a maximum of 15.4 billion kroner from the tax rule change.

“Wood Mackenzie's calculations match well with our perception of reality,” Arne Westeng, the managing director of Bayerngas in Denmark, told Jyllands-Posten.

One of the major discrepancies between the government’s and Wood Mackenzie's calculations is that the government included future tax revenue from the Svane gas field, located far off the western shore of Denmark.

The 20 billion cubic metre gas field could satisfy Denmark’s gas consumption for five or six years, but currently no company owns a licence to extract the gas after Dong and Bayerngas chose to hand back their 35 and 30 percent respective shares in the field to the government in January.

“There is a considerable potential in Svane but no technology currently exists that will allow us to construct a well that can retrieve gas under the extreme temperatures and pressure found at Svane,” Westeng said.

Westeng has been a vocal critic of the government’s decision to harmonise the tax rules for North Sea oil and gas. In March he said the new rules – which affected only a small number of oil and gas companies – made Denmark an unattractive country to invest in and, as a result, the company was not planning to apply for any future licences in the Danish North Sea.

The government’s predicted oil and gas revenue also rests on an anticipation that oil prices will rise steadily over the coming years, something Westeng argues there is little basis for.

“The calculations in the government’s proposal predict oil to rise from $112 a barrel [today] to $132 a barrel in 2017 and continue to rise thereafter,” Westeng said. “I know of no oil company that would assume this calculation.”

Nartin Næsby, the managing director of the lobby group Olie Gas Danmark, also argues that the government’s figures are too optimistic.

“We don’t know where the 27.5 billion kroner is supposed to come from,” Næsby told Jyllands-Posten. “In general, I’d add that tightening tax regulations does not increase oil companies’ desire to invest.”

The Danish energy agency, Energistyrelsen, confirmed that while the Svane field had been returned to the state, revenue from Svane was included because the government expects new technology to make the gas extraction possible.

“Oil and gas is now being commercially retrieved in ways that were previously impossible,” Tue Falbe-Hansen, an Energistyrelsen spokesperson, told Jyllands-Posten. “It’s therefore reasonable to assume that the technology necessary to retrieve it will be possible in a few years time."


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”