92

Politics

Job and growth deal, part two, finalised

admin
April 25th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

The government will invest 75 billion to cut taxes and levies on business and increase public investment in a bid to support the economy

The second part of the government’s growth and jobs bill was agreed upon last night with opposition parties Venstre, Konservative and Liberal Alliance.

The 75 billion kroner deal is far more significant than the first deal, worth 15 billion kroner, and is designed to reduce burdens on businesses, increase investments and help create 150,000 new jobs by 2020.

Among the initiatives are the abolition of a CO2 levy on energy, easier access to financing, a corporate tax cut and an increase in public investment.

According to the finance minister, Bjarne Corydon (Socialdemokraterne), the deal will make a noticeable impact on Danish businesses.

“The deal will strengthen businesses to give them muscles to pull through when the crisis ends and it means that more Danes will be waking up with a job to go to,” Corydon stated in a press release. “That’s what our country needs.”

The economy minister, Margrethe Vestager (Radikale), added that the two-part growth and jobs bill brought Denmark closer to securing increased growth and employment.

“The two deals are worth a little over 90 billion kroner,” Vestager told public broadcaster DR. “We are reducing taxes and levies and increasing the options for public investment. We are also creating more further education for adults. The deal makes it more attractive to run a business and create jobs in Denmark.”

The reduction in the corporate tax from 25 percent to 22 percent will be phased in between 2014 and 2016 and will not apply to banks, nor oil companies operating in the Danish North Sea.

The lowered rate is intended to match corporate tax cuts in Sweden and the UK and will cost around 24 billion kroner in lost tax revenue by 2020.

Businesses will also benefit from a series of cuts to levies on energy and waste management that are hoped to improve their bottom line at a cost to the government of around 12.5 billion kroner by 2020.

An additional 15 billion kroner of public investments has been promised by 2020, while around 15 billion kroner have been set aside to fund renovation and support the building sector.

The deal will be paid for using cuts to both student grants (SU) and the least generous unemployment benefit (kontanthjælp), as well as reducing the rate of growth in the public sector.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”