83

Politics

Government locked in negotiations on welfare reform and growth bill

admin
April 16th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Opposition parties are setting demands in exchange for their support of a reform of unemployment benefits and student subsidies that will pay for a growth and jobs bill

Tough political negotiations are currently underway as the government attempts to strike a deal with the opposition on two important political reforms and a bill to support Danish business and help the economy grow.

The negotiations are complicated, however, as the reforms are being used to finance the growth and jobs bill meaning that all three must take place simultaneously.

The growth bill is hoped to rekindle the Danish economy but two opposition parties, Venstre (V) and Konservative (K), want the government to be more ambitious than the 1.8 billion kroner currently offered for “new initiatives”.

“We have congratulated the government for its proposal but are now pushing to increase the ambition,” K's financial spokesperson, Mike Legarth, told Berlingske newspaper. “We want to find an even larger amount and ensure that its effect is felt even quicker so that businesses feel the help now rather than in a few years.”

V's leader, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, also said that the proposed growth package was a “step in the right direction”. But while he would like to see a complete halt on any new taxes and levies on businesses, a so-called 'burden stop', he admitted it’s unlikely the government would agree to it.

The reforms of the student grant system, SU, and the least generous unemployment benefit, kontanthjælp, will result in significant long-term changes and, as a result, the government is interested in passing both reforms by as large a majority as possible.

The main obstacle is currently the far-right Dansk Folkeparti (DF), which wants the government to address several demands before continuing with the negotiations.

First is the recent EU ruling that EU students should be entitled to SU as long as they have worked in Denmark prior to starting their studies. The ruling is likely to significantly increase the cost of SU and negate part of the savings the reform achieves.

“During the negotiations the government told us that SU will end up costing between 400 and 500 million kroner more and that is problematic,” DF's leader, Kristian Thulesen Dahl, told Berlingske on Monday. “We face a challenge if we have to save SU while also allowing residents from other countries to come to Denmark and claim SU even if they have only had a part-time job working between six and eight hours a week.”

DF is also unhappy with using savings made through the reforms of SU and kontanthjælp to pay for cutting the corporate tax rate from 25 to 22 percent, which is a central element in the government’s growth bill. The government has decided, therefore, to open a parallel negotiation with DF about an alternative growth package that does not include the corporate tax cut.

Finally, DF objects to how deeply the government has proposed cutting kontanthjælp especially its reduction for all recipients under the age of 30. They want to increase the rate that under-30s with an education receive and remove the demand that couples under the age of 25 provide for each other instead of receiving the benefit.

“If a couple moves in together as 22-year-olds, it’s far from certain that they will stay together the rest of their lives,” DF spokesperson Bent Bøgsted told Altinget. “That’s why we can’t demand that they provide for each other.”

V, on the other hand, is pushing for stronger sanctions for kontanthjælp recipients who consistently refuse to take work.

Rasmussen has also argued that the growth bill needs new initiatives to limit the amount of products, such as beer and soda, that Danes buy cheaply across the border in Germany.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”