85

Politics

Proposed city government reform hanging by a thread

admin
April 10th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Savings on the cost of government in the country’s largest cities are there for the taking, but political infighting could doom the process before it starts

The country's four largest cities could save as much as 250 million kroner each year if they adopted a single mayor form of government rather than the current system that sees power divided among several independent administrations, often headed by members of opposing political parties, according to an Interior Ministry report.

The projected savings for Copenhagen, Aarhus, Aalborg and Odense, however, are stranded on a difference of opinion between PM Helle Thorning-Schmidt (Socialdemokraterne) and Annette Vilhelmsen, the leader of coalition member SF, over whether the changes are necessary.

Party leaders from Socialdemokraterne (S) have tried for months to convince SF members of the savings potential. But the mayors of those four cities are all members of Socialdemokraterne, and SF suspects its allies are simply trying to consolidate power.

Despite the potential savings, the reform was already on thin ice after both Enhedslisten and Venstre declined to support the reform when it was proposed in parliament by the interior minister, Margrethe Vestager (Radikale), in January.

Ninna Thomsen (SF), who heads Copenhagen's healthcare administration, praised Vilhelmsen’s stance against the proposal.

“It is my impression that SF has dug in its heels, and I am obviously very happy with that,” Thomsen told Politiken newspaper.

S spokesperson Simon Kollerup argued that SF's position was costing the taxpayers money.

“They owe an explanation to our residents as to why they want to keep a model that is so inefficient that it costs Copenhagen over 150 million kroner annually for something that is totally unnecessary.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”