160

Politics

Former culture minister deemed not guilty of conflict of interest

admin
March 20th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Uffe Elbæk did nothing wrong by hosting lavish affairs at husband’s school, state auditor rules

The national auditor’s office has concluded that Uffe Elbæk (Radikale) was not guilty of a conflict of interest when he hosted official dinners and meetings at Akademiet for Utæmmet Kreativitet (AFUK), an art school where his husband is employed, and where he himself was a member of the board.

Elbæk found himself in the centre of a political storm last year after it emerged that he had spent 180,000 kroner on five official dinners and meetings at AFUK.

A report published by Rigsrevisionen today said that Elbæk’s actions did not constitute a conflict of interest.

Elbæk was called into a meeting in parliament last December to offer up an explanation for the pricey dinners. Prior to the meeting, Elbæk maintained that he had discussed the five lavish events with officials from his ministry, who raised no concerns. Following the meeting, Elbæk said that he had in fact been warned about the dinners.

“There was a ministry official who was good enough to pull me aside and say: ‘Uffe, we need to discuss this. In the long-term, this isn’t very smart’,” Elbæk said at the time. “And I completely agree with him.”

That change in explanation led far-left party Enhedslisten and opposition party Venstre to call for Rigsrevisionen to investigate the case. Today the auditors released a report saying that Elbæk had done nothing wrong.

The Culture Ministry itself did not get off so easily. The auditors said that the ministry should have investigated whether Elbæk was involved in activities that were a conflict of interest, which it did not do. The prices for the affairs thrown by the former minister also exceeded the ministry’s cost-per-person guidelines, which the auditors said also should have been investigated by the ministry.

Elbæk resigned from his position as culture minister shortly after the December meeting with parliament. He was replaced by Marianne Jelved (Radikale).


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”