114

Sport

Olympic omission bodyslams wrestling association

admin
February 13th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Sport faces exclusion from the 2020 games ? nearly three millennia after its introduction

“It’s a complete catastrophe,” Palle Nielsen, the spokesperson of the Danish Wrestling Association, told The Copenhagen Post following the news that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has voted to drop his sport from the 2020 games onwards.

“To think that we’re coming into a world were Olympic sports are chosen on commercial interests is absolutely ridiculous.”

The IOC confirmed on Tuesday that wrestling had been dropped from the core 25 sports that make up the Olympic Games from 2020. The body bases such decisions on various factors, including TV ratings, global popularity, ticket sales and anti-doping reputations.

It will be the first time since the Paris Games of 1900 that the sport will not be included, and it is particularly surprising considering that wrestling is recognised as the world’s oldest competitive sport, according to Olympic.org, the official website of the Olympic Movement. The sport was introduced into the ancient Olympics in 708 BC and cave drawings of wrestlers have been found dating as far back as 3000 BC.

To be reincluded, the sport will now have to compete with seven other sports ­– baseball/softball, wushu (kung fu), roller sports, sport climbing, wakeboarding, squash and karate –  for just one spot at the 2020 Olympics. Recent additions to the Olympics include golf and rugby sevens, which are making their debuts at the 2016 games.

However, there is a slim chance that the IOC’s decision could be overturned when the committee meets in September, but Nielsen conceded that it is unlikely.

“It’s not over yet,” Nielsen said. “While there’s still a chance that the decision can be overturned, there is still hope. But we’re in a complete state of shock.”

Nielsen is not the only wrestling representative who is surprised at the IOC’s decision. The international wrestling body, FILA, condemned the move in a press release as “astonishing”, and insisted it will “take all necessary measures to convince the IOC members of the aberration of such a decision against one of the founding sports of the ancient and modern Olympic Games”.

Even the Danish representatives of the IOC (DIF) are bemused at the verdict.

“To omit such a classic Olympic sport is nothing short of surprising,” Niels Nygaard, a spokesperson for the DIF, wrote in a press statement. “It’s especially regrettable from a Danish perspective, as we’ve had a strong tradition with the sport in the last three Olympics.”

The IOC has defended its actions by reiterating that its recommendations for the 25 core sports are based around the future development of sporting interests around the world. However, it is not the first time wrestling has come under some scrutiny by Olympic officials who, following the 2004 Olympics in Athens, put pressure on the sport’s representatives to make it more TV and spectator-friendly.

“The question is not what’s wrong with wrestling,” Mark Adams, the communications officer for the IOC, told journalists at a press conference in Switzerland. “But what’s right for the 2020 Games.”

When The Copenehagen Post asked the IOC to go into greater detail regarding “what’s right for the 2020 Games”, the IOC released the following statement: “The Olympic programme must balance historical perspective with new trends, universal participation and regional preferences, team and individuals sports, combat and artistic disciplines. In other words, it must appeal to the interests of people of all ages around the world. It has to cater for all tastes. Thus the determination of the core sports and the composition of the Olympic Programme is a complex matter and not a simple task.”

But Nielsen is not convinced. “I don’t get it,” he said. “I was at both the London and Beijing Olympic Games, and wrestling was fiercely popular. Definitely no shortage of ticket sales there. It’s a very strange decision and I don’t have any sympathy with it.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”