99

Sport

Selling footballers to investors a form of slavery, FA says

admin
January 7th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

As more teams resort to the tactic of transferring player rights to private investors, the football association warns a ban may be on the way

When Mads Albæk, was browsing through some sports news just after Christmas, the 22-year-old footballer stumbled across some disturbing news … about himself.

Albæk, a promising midfielder who has played 127 senior matches for the Superliga club FC Midtjylland since his debut in 2008, read that he, and six other of the club’s players, had had their transfer rights sold to a group of investors in order to stave off financial ruin. No one had bothered to ask if Albæk was interested.

“It’s quite unpleasant to be sold from one day to the next without being informed about it at all. Honestly, I feel like a commodity in a supermarket,” Albæk told Politiken newspaper. “I don’t know where I stand and I have no idea whether it is the club or the investors that decide whether I am to be sold if an offer comes.”

In addition to FCM, Superliga clubs AGF, AaB, Esbjerg, Silkeborg, Brøndby, Viborg and HB Køge have all had players owned by third-party investors. 

Dansk Boldspil Union (DBU), the Danish football association, likened the manoeuvre to slavery and said it is looking into banning third-party ownership in Denmark, as is the case in the UK and France.

“At a minimum, we must develop clear and restrictive rules that shed light on how these contracts are put together,” Allan Hansen, the head of DBU, told Politiken.

Player union Spillerforeningen was up in arms over the revelations.

“The players, in worst-case scenarios, could easily end up in the clutches of people that they normally wouldn’t touch with a ten-foot pole,” Thomas Lindrup, a former footballer and head of Spillerforeningen, told Politiken. Lindrup also indicated that Spillerforeningen would discuss the issue in depth during their next meeting sometime in January.

In Albæk’s case, the investor group deal means that his new unknown owners have secured a 75 percent stake in all future income that his sale may bring. It also means that FCM won’t have to sell their players cheaply to avoid bankruptcy.

FCM has readily used the third-party investor schemes to raise the required funds to stave off bankruptcy. The transfer rights of more than ten of their current most promising talents have been sold to investors, garnering them nearly 30 million kroner.

Despite the criticism, Claus Steinlein, FCM’s sporting director, argued that selling transfer rights to investors did not affect whether the club would sell players overseas and the Albæk issue occurred because the club was unable to contact the players because the deals were secured during the Christmas holiday period.

“I can understand why people on the outside wonder about these deals, but we’ve been struggling financially for a while now and these investors have helped a lot,” Steinlein told Politiken.

In addition to Albæk, FCM has sold Santiago Villafane, Petter Andersson, Marco Larsen, Pione Sisto, Mads Pedersen and Erik Sviatchenko to the investor group. FCM has also adjusted its profits from a significant loss to a profit of three million kroner.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”