138

Opinion

An Actor’s Life | To leave or not to leave

December 2nd, 2012


This article is more than 12 years old.

Dear Reader, hope this finds you well. As I write this, I have only four performances left of what’s been a truly memorable experience performing Harold Pinter’s ‘Old Times’. Small nuances have changed the way we and the audiences have responded to it. Fifty percent of our audience is students of one form or another.

They get the chance to study the text in advance and maybe even to act out some scenes themselves before they come to the intimate theatre that is Krudttønden. Teachers, who have taken this path and ask to have an informal chat with the actors after the show, say that it really helps their students’ understanding of how English is used in conversation. It helps with their confidence, which as we all know is such a fragile egg.

It’s one thing to read a play and another experience to see the words coming to life from real pretend people who are virtually in the same room.

Pinter, though, isn’t everyone’s cuppa tea. Some people must have seen some awful productions in which it was all taken too seriously, or in which the actors treated these famous Pinter pauses like they were religious dogma that must be obeyed, regardless of whether there was nothing going on in the minds of the characters. Seeing people internally counting to five for a pause and then 15 for a silence is deadly. I know. I’ve seen it and, because I’m a considerate person, have left at a suitable moment during the proceedings.

It was a course of action that three young Østerbro hoodies didn’t take earlier this week. They must have been outside the theatre just before 8pm and saw lots of teenagers piling in. “What’s going on in there?” they must have thought and decided to find out. They came in at the very last minute, telling the person on the door that they were with one of the student groups. This ruse worked and all of a sudden they found themselves in a dark room with 97 other people. There were three places left by chance, which they duly took. The seats were in the front row.

Cue a Pinter pause.

They still had no idea what was to jump out at them. I wonder what they were thinking as they looked at the set and heard the pre-show music? I’ll probably never find out, but as the play started with Pinter’s fragmented and funny dialogue, I could hear them saying things like: “What’s this all about?” Or words to that effect, without adding the expletives interjected into their short sentences. After ten minutes, they decided that they’d made a mistake and almost apologetically collectively stood up and walked out. “Sorry, just not for us!” one said as they left.

A part of me admires them for being curious in the first place and for having the bottle to chance it, to find out what was going on. You can’t please everyone, as someone much wiser than yours truly once said. Indeed, you will drive yourself mad if you try to.

If you came to see it on your own accord, then thanks. If you didn’t, maybe we’ll see you for the next production.

All the best, Ian

About


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”