100

Politics

Taxgate testimony casts additional doubts on political meddling

admin
November 9th, 2012


This article is more than 12 years old.

Prominent politicians from both Venstre and Socialdemokraterne tried to interfere with the audit of the PM and her husband

After another day of testimony in the Taxgate commission, additional doubt was cast on politicians on both ends on the spectrum for their roles in the confidential audit of PM Helle Thorning-Schmidt (Socialdemokraterne) and her husband Stephen Kinnock.

 

Appearing before the commission yesterday, Skat Copenhagen’s tax director Lisbeth Rasmussen said that Skat officials felt that the tax minister at the time, Troels Lund Poulsen (Venstre) “asked a lot of questions” about the confidential audit.

 

Rasmussen also said that Peter Loft, a former top Tax Ministry official who worked closely with Poulsen, applied consistent pressure to the Skat officials working on the audit.

 

After the audit ruled that Kinnock, a British national who worked in Switzerland at the time, did not owe Danish taxes, Rasmussen said that Loft continued to express his doubt about the ruling.

 

“It seemed like [Loft] was getting pressure from somewhere because somebody wanted a different result,” Rasmussen said. 

 

Loft's role in Taxgate ultimately cost him his job.

 

For the first time in the Taxgate commission’s work to uncover the full story behind the leak of the audit, the commission opted to hold part of yesterday’s testimony behind closed doors.

 

Rasmussen was to tell the commission about information about Kinnock that she received from Thorning-Schmidt’s S-colleague, and the current finance minister, Bjarne Corydon. Corydon, for his part, stressed that although he respected the commission’s decision, he would have preferred that his role in the case be discussed openly.

 

Although it is unknown what Rasmussen said yesterday, various media outlets reported that Corydon approached Skat Copenhagen during last autumn’s election season and requested that Skat publicly refute rumours that were circulating amongst journalists at the time. 

 

It can be safely assumed that the rumours Corydon was referring to had to do with Kinnock’s sexuality. Rumours that Kinnock is either gay or bisexual led to Thorning-Schmidt going on the offensive in August and pre-emptively striking down a comment in the audit about her husband’s sexual preferences.

 

The comment apparently stemmed from the couple’s personal accountant, Frode Holm. The commission's investigation turned up a text written by Rasmussen that read: “After prolonged discussion, Frode Holm explained that SK [Stephen Kinnock] is bisexual/homosexual.” Holm said that he was making a comment that he thought would benefit the couple and remain confidential.

 

Poulsen’s former spindoctor, Peter Arnfeldt, who faces police charges for the “basis of suspicion” that he leaked the audit to the press, told the commission last month that rumours about Kinnock’s sexuality have been swirling since 2010.

 

As if the case of the leak of Thorning-Schmidt and Kinnock’s 2010 audit wasn’t complicated enough, questions have now also emerged about the handling of Thorning-Schmidt’s tax status in 1999.

 

Rasmussen told the commission that a memo was presented in connection to the current case in which the Tax Ministry ruled that Thorning-Schmidt wasn’t liable for Danish taxes when she was elected to the EU parliament in 1999. Despite the ruling that she wasn’t liable for Danish taxes, she ended up having to pay them anyway. According to Rasmussen, that was due to political meddling in the case.

 

That revelation led opposition party Dansk Folkeparti to demand yet another investigation.

 

“It is incredibly important that we get to the bottom of this so that Danes moving forward can have confidence that all citizens have their tax cases treated equally, and that there is not the risk of political interference, which seemed to the case in 1999 on behalf of Socialdemokratiet [the former name of Socialdemokraterne],” DF’s tax spokesperson Dennis Flydtkjær told DR News. 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”