120

Politics

Fat tax faces the axe in 2013 budget

admin
November 6th, 2012


This article is more than 12 years old.

The government is still negotiating a 2013 budget that would likely see the end of a fat tax the European Commission thinks may be illegal

All political parties remain in the negotiations for a 2013 budget that is expected to be completed within a week.

The minority coalition government presented its budget proposal in late August, which opposition party Venstre and government support party Enhedslisten announced they did not support.

But after the government last week met with the far-right Dansk Folkeparti, which could alone secure the government a majority, the rest of the parties announced they are still willing to negotiate to ensure they leave their mark.

The finance minister, Bjarne Corydon (Socialdemokraterne), has stated that the government will not rule out negotiating with anyone.

“That’s 100 percent sure,” Corydon said last week “The government only cares about the content. There’s an opportunity for all parties, even Dansk Folkeparti, to join a deal.”

The controversial surcharge on the fat content of foods, implemented last year, and a planned similar surcharge on sugar, are the key negotiating points with the main opposition party Venstre. The party has long argued that Danish businesses are losing out as consumers choose to do their shopping in Germany, where many products are significantly cheaper.

In the government’s budget proposal, however, it did not include in removing these taxes that are forecast to raise 2.5 billion kroner a year.

They government has since said they would agree to eliminating the taxes in exchange for increasing the bundskat, or bottom tax rate, by 0.3 percent to 4.64 percent, in order to make up the lost revenue.

“If it is possible to abolish the fat and sugar taxes, we will, but it will require that every kroner in lost income is refinanced,” Nadeem Farooq, tax spokesperson for coalition party Radikale told Jyllands-Posten.

Abolishing the fat tax would also mean a quiet end to a European Commission investigation into whether the tax illegally gives preferential treatment to some products.

The fat tax is complex and is not applied to all high-fat products. For example the margarine producers union, Margarineforening, has complained that the tax is applied to its member's products, but not to full-fat milk.

In a written answer to Venstre MP Torben Schack Pedersen, the Tax Ministry acknowledged that the European Commission had started an investigation based on these complaints.

According to Jyllands-Posten, the Tax Ministry wrote “the European Commission will decide this autumn, based on their initial investigation, whether there are grounds to start proceedings for a case about [illegal] state support.”

While the government acknowledged that it has been asked to account for the legality of the tax under EU legislation, it has refused to comment on the content of the correspondence with the EU.

Pedersen said the correspondence with the EU is cause for concern.

“I don’t think the commission normally sends out friendly letters to the ministry," Pedersen told Jyllands-Posten. "They only contacted Denmark because there are unanswered questions and problems. The EU’s involvement is another reason to abolish the tax as soon as possible.”

The fat tax was first proposed to parliament in 2009 by the former Venstre-Konservative government. Konservative tax spokesperson Brian Mikkelsen said the European Commission has raised issues with the tax on several occasions.

“There were many problems with EU rules when we introduced it,” Mikkelsen told Jyllands-Posten. "Those problems were never cleared up.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”