155

Opinion

Opinion | Serbian question should top Denmark’s EU agenda

October 11th, 2012


This article is more than 12 years old.

Serbians are permitted to travel to the EU without a visa, and Serbia is a candidate to join the union. Nevertheless, it would appear that membership lies at the end of a long and winding path. As an EU official once explained in jest: Serbia will become an EU member during a Turkish presidency. A big roadblock is Kosovo which, despite declaring its independence in 2008, is still viewed by many Serbians as a part of their country.

The EU has made normalised relations with Pristina a mandatory condition of Serbia’s EU membership. That includes things like a common border patrol, resolving telecommunications and power supply issues and carrying out any agreements the two parties have agreed on. At some point, Serbia may also have to pledge not to veto a Kosovan bid for EU membership, should the sovereignty at some point in the future seek to apply.

Kosovo, though, is far from Serbia’s biggest hindrance to EU membership. The country’s economic problems are staggering, leaving many Serbians desperate. The figures tell a grim tale: 30 percent unemployment, 10 percent inflation and deep debt. Given the chance, many young people would flee the country for greener pastures. 

Working in Serbia’s favour is the relatively high education level of its populace, and Danish pump maker Grundfos reports positive experiences with the employees it has hired in Serbia. The country has a well-functioning infrastructure and there is – depending on which city you are in – strong support for foreign investment. Seen as a whole, Serbia’s economy is far better off than other countries in the region, including EU members Bulgaria and Romania. 

Slain PM Zoran Djindjic deserves much of the credit for the free and fair elections now held in Serbia. Freedom of speech is also widely respected. Minorities are by and large protected, be they Hungarians in the Vojvodina province, Romanians or Roma. 

Unfortunately, these protections aren’t always extended to homosexuals, a trend we see elsewhere in eastern and central Europe. In 2010, anti-gay groups attacked the annual homosexual parade and a violent conflict between parade-goers and troublemakers erupted in central Belgrade. 

The biggest question, though, is what policies Serbia’s newly elected president and its newly seated government, which includes representatives from the right-wing Serbian Progress Party, will follow. So far, the rhetoric has been forward-looking. The government’s primary goal is EU membership. 

Progress, the Serbians understand, depends on whether or not the Serbian government can implement agreements with Kosovo and whether or not that relationship can develop. The nationalist government is by no means a group of soft-hearts, but as many Belgrade political commentators point out, hard-hearted politics may be what it takes to make the compromises EU membership requires, not least when it comes to Kosovo. 

Regardless of how enormous Serbia’s problems are, the EU should set a date to begin negotiations with the country, and it should be a Danish priority to help this process along.

It’s worth pointing out that beginning negotiations is far from actual accession. Turkey, for example, has been negotiating since 2005 without any real prospect of ever becoming a member.

Still, a date could potentially help stabilise a corner of Europe where armed conflict still lurks in places like Kosovo and Macedonia. Setting a date to begin negotiations would also serve to bring Serbia out of its identity crisis. 

Ever since the downfall of Slobodan Milosevic, many Serbians have dreamt of a closer relationship with the Europe they feel they are a part of. Setting a date to begin negotiations will be a show of support for those working towards reconciliation and collaboration with each other and with neighbouring countries. 

The biggest benefit setting a negotiating date will have, however, will be to put pressure on Serbia to carry out crucial economic, political and social reforms. A Europeanised Serbia is in our interest – regardless of whether or not Serbia ever becomes a member of the EU.

The author is president of Europa Bevægelsen (the Danish European Movement)

Read the EU's progress report on Serbia's candidacy to become a member state, released on Oct 10.

About


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”