193

Politics

Unions in united front against government

admin
October 1st, 2012


This article is more than 12 years old.

As parliament opens on Tuesday, public employees’ unions mount a campaign to protest proposed cuts in unemployment benefits

Ten unions representing more than half a million public workers including teachers, nurses, sanitation workers and other civil servants have united to send a clear message to the government: proposed cuts in public unemployment benefits (dagpenge) will result in a “social disaster” in Denmark. The unions have drafted an open letter to the government, placed ads in daily newspapers and plan on holding public protests to mark tomorrow’s opening day ceremonies at parliament.

"It's about waking this government up and making it clear that they need to choose a different path," Bodil Otto, head of the municipal’s employees union HK, told Politiken newspaper.

Although unions and a red government are usually seen as comrades-in-arms, representatives of the ten unions have signed off on an open letter saying that the government’s current path will destroy the nation’s social system and result in economic disaster for thousands of workers.

The ads slated to appear in daily newspapers around the country tomorrow read 'Godt Nytar' (Happy New Year) at the top and show a photo of a can of cod, implying that Danes will not be able to afford fresh fish for the traditional New Year's Eve cod dish, and will have to resort to using the canned stuff instead. Some have suggested that there is also a not so hidden message to the government implied in the ad. Calling someone a 'torsk', or cod, in Danish is the same as calling them a 'fool'. The ad’s copy warns that over 20,000 workers could lose their benefits at the beginning of next year and as many as 2,400 workers each month could lose their benefits in 2013.

The unions said that this is the beginning of the dismantling of a social system that has always provided public employees economic safety and security in the form of unemployment benefits if they lose their jobs.

Dennis Kristensen, the president of FOA, a union whose members include many social and health care workers, denied that the campaign is designed to make things tough for the government.

"We want to make life easier for the unemployed," Kristensen told Politiken.

Kristensen said that while it may be unrealistic to believe that the campaign will be effective in preventing unemployment benefits being reduced to two years, he hoped that the effort would result in additional benefits and make it easier for workers to reapply.

"The vast majority could be saved with our proposal," said Kristensen.

In the open letter, the unions stated that it is the flexibility of the labour market that has allowed Denmark to weather the economic crisis better than some other countries.

"In Denmark, we have a flexible labour market," the letter reads. "On the one hand, it is easy for Danish employers to hire and fire employees, allowing them to quickly adapt to current developments. On the other hand, the employees have a sense of security and safety in the form of unemployment benefits should they lose their job."

The unions said that in other European countries, getting rid of a public employee is an expensive and time-consuming process, and that by removing the security of unemployment benefits to its workers, the government is "cutting one leg off" of Denmark's system.

The union letter warned against trying to balance the national budget on the backs of civil servants.

"The public sector plays a key role – not in opposition to the private sector, but rather as a prerequisite for growth and job creation in the private sector."  In their proposal, the unions lay out a seven-part plan calling on the government to reduce waiting times for benefits and provide money for training, job rotations with full benefits, paid internships and initiatives that will create jobs immediately.

"A new study showed that Danes fear unemployment more than anything else," wrote the union leaders. "Having a job is the most important resource in our society."

Following PM Helle Thorning-Schmidt's (Socialdemokraterne) speech to officially open parliament tomorrow, union members have invited MPs to sit down and break bread with some of those workers scheduled to lose their benefits at the end of the year. The unions have also scheduled public protests for tomorrow afternoon.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”