134

Sport

Laudrup stirs up controversy with match-fixing claim

admin
September 21st, 2012


This article is more than 12 years old.

While the Swansea City coach believes players guilty of being paid to lose should be banned from the game for life, paying someone to win isn’t a problem

Danish football legend Michael Laudrup has made a dazzling start to his Premier League managerial career with Swansea City, thrilling fans and pundits alike with his attacking brand of football.

But yesterday, Laudrup created a buzz of a different kind when he suggested it was okay to give another team a financial incentive for winning.

"If Swansea play the last game against a team and a third team pays Swansea to win the game, I really don't see anything bad about that,” Laudrup said according to BBC News. “For me, match-fixing is when somebody pays someone to lose a game.”

Laudrup’s remarks came as he was asked about match-fixing at a news conference. Match-fixing has been a prevalent issue in European football as of late, particularly in Italy, where more than a dozen clubs are currently under investigation. The scandal is the third major one to rock the country in 32 years following Calcio Gate in 2006, which saw Juventus relegated, and Totonero in 1980 – in both cases Italy went on to win the next World Cup!

Laudrup played in Italy with Juventus and Lazio between 1983 and 1989 before moving on to Barcelona in Spain.

Laudrup said that players guilty of being paid to lose should be banned from the game for life, but he did not have a problem with the ‘suitcase’ culture in Spain where teams pay other teams to beat their league rivals.

“It's just a bonus. For me, match-fixing is somebody paying someone to lose a game," Laudrup said. “In Spain where there's one or two matches left in a season, we always talked about the suitcases. But the suitcases are to win. I don't see anything bad about that. I think we have to define very well what is match-fixing because there's different levels, I think.”

Laudrup became familiar with the ‘suitcase’ process during his playing years with Barcelona and Real Madrid. More recently, he has also coached Getafe and Real Mallorca.

Neither Football Association nor Premier League spokesmen commented on Laudrup’s admission, but both bodies' laws clearly state that accepting or giving money to influence the outcome of a match is unlawful.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”