275

Politics

SF silences its inner critic

admin
August 15th, 2012


This article is more than 12 years old.

Özlem Cekic stripped of spokesperson roles for refusing to support tax reform

Say what we want or don’t say anything at all.

That was the message that the brass of the Socialistisk Folkeparti (SF) delivered to Özelm Cekic yesterday when the party stripped her of her spokesperson roles.

Cekic has been in hot water with her own party for refusing to support the tax reform deal that SF, along with governing coalition parties Socialdemokraterne (S) and Radikale (R), cut with opposition parties Venstre (V) and Konservative (K).

Cekic argues that the tax reform punishes the unemployed and those on public benefits while providing tax breaks for the wealthy. When she spoke out against the tax reform, SF temporarily stripped her of her spokesperson duties. At yesterday’s party meeting, those suspensions were suspended indefinitely.

SF’s political leader Pernille Vigsø Bagge defended the party’s actions to Politiken newspaper.

“The tax reform in large part is about social issues, which Özlem had been the spokesperson for until summer holiday, so it’s clear that she can’t continue in that position when she fundamentally disagrees with the policies that will be implemented in that area, Bagge said.

Bagge dismissed the idea that Cekic represented a part of SF that has been unsatisfied with the party’s decisions, but several party members that spoke with Politiken indicated that Cekic’s views indeed have internal support.

“Özlem is the only SFer that has maintained that she doesn’t wish to vote for a tax reform that will increase inequality,” Lene Linnemann, a member of SF’s Aalborg regional concil, told Politiken. “It’s awfully strange to punish an SFer that stands by the party’s original politics. I think it’s dumb.”

Other local and regional SF members echoed the sentiment to Politiken.

For her part, Cekic called the punishment “hard” but struck a defiant tone.

“The punishment is nothing compared to the those people affected by [the reform] – people on public benefits and the jobless that are going to have to pay for tax cuts,” she told Politiken. “I am an SFer. I was before I went in to the group meeting, I am now, and I will be tomorrow. I’m going to continue to work for SF policies and there is nobody that can take that from me.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”