278

Politics

Prime Minister’s Office criticised for “mistreatment” of policy architect

admin
June 25th, 2012


This article is more than 12 years old.

Government officials did not follow “standard procedure” after ruling would-be finance minister posed a possible security threat

Parliament’s ombudsman today levelled a scathing criticism against the Prime Minister’s Office and the Justice Ministry for their “highly objectionable” treatment of Henrik Sass Larsen, a Socialdemokrat MP who was widely expected to become the finance minister after last September’s general election.

Larsen, an architect of the party’s policy, was told on September 28 that his dealings with a leading member of a criminal motorcycle gang in the town of Køge – including exchanging text messages – made him a security threat and ruled him out of a cabinet seat.

Larsen, however, was only allowed to briefly see the results of the security investigation, and was told only orally that the information surrounding the investigation was confidential.

Ombudsman Jørgen Steen Jørgensen, in today’s ruling, called it questionable whether an oral warning was valid.

“Even a person in a position such as Henrik Sass Larsen should be able to assume that standard procedure applied in his case, and that his legal rights were clear,” Jørgensen said.

The lapses, according to Jørgensen, were even more glaring, given the media pressure on Larsen to reveal details of the matter.

Despite criticising the way Larsen was treated, the ombudsman’s report concluded that “the Justice Ministry was under no obligation to honour Henrik Sass Larsen’s request to be given a copy of the report”.

Jørgensen, however, said it was possible Larsen could obtain the report if he requested it through a freedom of information request.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”