88

Business

Cash lost in the ethernet

admin
June 18th, 2012


This article is more than 12 years old.

Slow transfer times mean that while you wait for your money to move between accounts, banks are earning a billion kroner a year

In an age of instant communication where everything from music to the latest films are available in the wink of an eye, why does it still take banks up to six working days to electronically transfer money from one account to another? The reason is that banks are making a killing on interest, according to an article in Politiken newspaper.

"The slow movement of transfers means that the bank does not have to pay interest earned to either party,” Troels Holmberg, an economist for Forbrugerrådet, a consumer watchdog, told Politiken.

Even though the money is sitting in a kind of financial limbo – somewhere between the sender’s and receiver’s accounts – it is still listed among the bank’s assets, so banks are essentially double dipping.

"The fact that banks have stayed out of the digital age is very good business for them,” Morten Westergaard, from the analysis group Mybanker, told Politiken. “By waiting to move money, they earn their bank interest rates while saving the interest they should have paid to the customer.”

Conservative estimates say that banks earned 1.1 billion kroner in 2010 by dragging their feet when making transfers between accounts.

Although banks have been reluctant to increase the speed of transactions, in 2013 customers can expect transfers to be made on the same day they are requested. 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”