285

Politics

Former PM to pay for smoking booth

admin
March 7th, 2012


This article is more than 12 years old.

The 154,000 kroner cost for a smoking booth was more expensive than he had realised, Lars Løkke Rasmussen wrote, though he did not divulge who would ultimately pay up

Lars Løkke Rasmussen, leader of opposition party Venstre, declared on Facebook yesterday that he was prepared to pay for the smoking booth that was installed in his office by his party while he was prime minister.

Rasmussen did not say whether he or the party would be paying, but he added that the booth, which allowed him to smoke in the otherwise smoke-free indoor environment, was “very expensive. Much more expensive than I had imagined and beyond what I find reasonable”.

He added that he did not want the issue of the smoking booth to fog over more important political questions.

“That’s why I am now ensuring that the Prime Minister’s Office is reimbursed for the costs,” he wrote.

The move arrives after his party, Venstre, insisted that the current Socialdemokrat food minister Mette Gjerskov pay for her own smoking cabinet in her office.

The smoking booths – telephone booth-like structures with ventilators to draw smoke away – were installed after rules came into effect preventing smoking in private office in the parliament's Christiansborg complex. But while Gjerskov’s both cost 34,000 kroner, Løkke’s cost 154,000 kroner.

According to Rasmussen, the smoking booth was installed on the initiative of the administration of the Prime Minister's Office and suggested that guidelines for their installation in ministerial offices be written in order to avoid problems in the future.

“It is my personal policy – and also the current Danish law – that people should be allowed to smoke in offices that are the workplace for only one person,” Rasmussen wrote. “That is why I could smoke in the private side room to the prime minster’s office where guests do not have access. That is what I did – and what I hope to do again in the future.”

But the mere fact that the 154,000 kroner bill would be covered was not enough for Socialdemokraterne, whose spokesperson, Magnus Heunicke, demanded to know whether Rasmussen or his party would be paying.

“Lars Løkke needs to be open on this issue. It’s a rather precise question he has to answer: who is paying?” Heunicke said to Berlingske newspaper.

If Rasmussen’s party ends up covering the bill, it might violate regulations on the use of party funds.

Gjerskov paid out of her own pocket for her smoking booth after Venstre’s health spokesperson Sophie Løhde accused Gjerskov of “arrogance” for spending 34,000 kroner to install one in her office in the food ministry, adding that it was “strange way to behave and use taxpayers’ money”.

But when quizzed at that time about Rasmussen’s own use of public funds to install a smoking booth, Løhde responded by saying she thought the situations were not the same.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”