340

Business

Magasin to stop sale of fur

admin
February 2nd, 2012


This article is more than 12 years old.

Animal rights groups praise the decision by the department store to end the sale of fur products in April

The sale of fur in Magasin will end completely in April 2012 as the department store brings its policy into line with that of its owner, the British chain Debenhams.

The decision to end the sale of fur at the department store was welcomed by Thorbjørn Shiønning from animal rights organisation, Anima.

“It’s great that Magasin is taking responsibility and is stopping the sale of fur,” Shiønning told public broadcaster DR. “It fits with the greater picture of what we have been seeing . The list of business which are against fur has grown over the past 10 years.”

According to Jan Helleskov from Magasin, the decision – which was made purely to harmonise their policies with that of their owner – will not have a great effect on its turnover.

“We are a part of Debenham’s in London which has had an anti-fur policy for the past 15 years,” Helleskov told DR. “Fur only comprises a small part of our turnover anyway.”

But as Copenhagen Fashion Week gets underway, MagasinÂ’s ban is unlikely to change Dansih fashion houses’ attitudes towards fur.

Fur auctioner Kopenhagen Fur is a regular participant at Copenhagen Fashion Week and will be presenting its products at a show this week.

“Copenhagen Fashion Week should follow Oslo’s good example and stop the use of fur,” Shiønning said. “But seeing as the fashion week’s managing director Eva Kruse once worked for Kopenhagen Fur, it makes sense that they would have a healthy relationship.”

Fur is big business for Denmark. Kopenhagen Fur attracts up to 600 foreign buyers to each of the five auctions it holds each year,  and which generate about two billion kroner in revenue for the company.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”