300

Politics

Energy plan on the rocks as opposition leaves talks

admin
January 20th, 2012


This article is more than 12 years old.

Despite cutting the cost by one billion kroner, opposition parties refuse to accept energy plan which could hit the pockets of ordinary Danes

Opposition party Venstre (V) walked out of energy negotiations with the government after only 16 minutes yesterday due to disagreements about the 4.6 billion kroner price tag of the government’s proposed plan.

The plan is designed to end DenmarkÂ’s reliance on fossil fuels and produce half of the nation’s energy from windmills by 2050, but Venstre and its opposition ally Konservative (K) want the government to cut an additional billion kroner before signing on.

The climate minister, Martin Lidegaard, has already brought the cost down from 5.6 billion kroner in order to secure the agreement of the opposition for the energy plan, which traditionally passes with cross-aisle consensus.

But speaking after the meeting, Venstre finance spokesperson Per Christiansen said it was still too expensive and they would not agree to anything costing more than 3.6 billion kroner.

”There are many employers and businesses who are saying that we are already having trouble remaining competitive,” Christiansen told Ritzau.

Lidegaard told Politiken newspaper that he was “astonished” by the opposition’s behaviour after they walked out, but added he had not ruled out cutting the plan further.

“Finding that much money is not easy; we’re talking about a lot of money,” Lidegaard told Politiken. “But you should never say never. You won’t get me drawing a line in the sand here.”

While V and K are playing strong cards, the first party to formally leave the negotiations was Liberal Alliance, citing concerns about the planÂ’s effect on businesses.

“The government wants to introduce even more energy taxes which will cost exports and workplaces,” Liberal Alliance energy spokesperson Villum Christensen told Ritzau in November.

The plan has not been universally condemned however, and business lobby group Dansk Erhverv has stated they support the plan as it gives businesses plenty of time to adapt to the changes.

“From a business perspective, governmentÂ’s plan is acceptable as the phasing in is stretched out over time,” Bo Sandberg, chief economist of Dansk Erhverv, told Ritzau.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”