346

Sport

Betting changes cause headaches for sports punters

admin
December 30th, 2011


This article is more than 13 years old.

Betting with the bookies will change forever in 2012, but will the end of the state monopoly actually mean less choice?

New betting regulations that come into force in the New Year bring a mixed bag of fortune for the nationÂ’s gambling sector. While its liberalisation will see a significant increase in the number of gaming companies with a presence in Denmark, the countryÂ’s online punters will be barred from betting with companies that do not hold a licence to operate here.

For years the state has enjoyed a betting monopoly, offering fixed odds and other gaming options from outlets (mostly found in kiosks) under the name Oddset. In search of better value – the state will typically pocket a 20 percent margin on a game of football, compared to the more typical eight percent in a competitive market like the UK – Danish punters have increasingly favoured online betting with operators based overseas. 

While the stateÂ’s decision to open the door to foreign competitors is expected to hit its earnings from Oddset, it will more than make this back through a 20 percent tax on gross income from the 38 companies that have so far been granted a total of 55 licences. Some 19 of the companies will offer sports betting – of the remainder, 13 are exclusively online casinos.    

In the build-up to the law change, some overseas bookmakers have been closing the accounts of their Danish-based clients because they are no longer able to offer them a service. One of them, British bookmaker Coral, advised its Danish-based customers that it had decided “with immediate effect to cease taking any further business through its websites from residents of Denmark due to a review of the group’s legal position”, and that it would be closing down all accounts “with immediate effect”.

The move is bad news for punters who value choice, particularly in the area of betting typically known as ‘specials’. Only a handful of the 19 operators are large-scale and long-established – Stanleybet and Ladbrokes are the best known.

Curiously, while many will be relieved to know that Betfair – the world’s largest online betting exchange, at which punters can offer as well as take bets – has obtained a licence, it is locked in a legal dispute with the Danish government over how it can operate. For the time being, Danish residents cannot sign up as new customers, and already existing clients can only continue to use the site once they have provided Betfair with their CPR number. Furthermore, its customers will, for the foreseeable future, be unable to exchange bets on horse or dog racing. 

The Danish tax minister, Thor Möger Pedersen, has warned international operators with plans to continue serving Danish customers that his government will follow the US example and block them.

“The orderly market means, among other things, that all gambling operators without a licence from 1 January 2012 risk that their website or payments will be blocked,” he stated.

However, since his statement, the Danish Gambling Authority has confirmed that while the new market will still officially open on January 1, it will be delaying the full implementation of its new gambling framework until February 1, blaming technical issues associated with user verification. 

The 19 companies that have obtained licences to provide sports betting are: Betfair, Betsson, Bonnier Gaming, Cashpoint, DanBook, Danske Licens, ElectraWorks, Entraction Operations, Hillside, iGame, Interactive Sports, InTouch Casino, Ladbrokes International, Nordic Betting, Nordic Odds, PKR Technologies, Scandic Bookmakers, Stanleybet International and Unibet.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”