380

Opinion

Inside this week | Two years after Cop15 – what have we learnt?

December 15th, 2011


This article is more than 13 years old.

Two years ago in this very column I confessed that I lie to my children in an effort to be climate-friendly: “When my daughter leaves a tap running I tell her she’s flooded the downstairs neighbours, who just happen to be Bangladeshi.” These were the words of a man with hope in his heart, because when the climate summit was hosted in Copenhagen, it really felt like we were all involved and really part of something – like this could be it, and we were about to rewrite history.

Or maybe I should have paid more attention as I was too busy (we went daily during Cop15) trying to find events, shops and restaurants for these super important climate delegates to visit during their two weeks here. I didn’t even know it was an annual event. I thought the ‘Cop’ stood for Copenhagen.

If I’d known then what I know now – that these super important climate delegates get their jollies every year in some exotic location (even the local prostitutes were offering it up for free to them – click here for this week’s rather seedy Going Underground) and achieve absolutely nothing – I would have sent them on a wild goose chase. Something like a tour of the biker bars in Amager, a game of chicken on Gammel Kongvej, and a restaurant recommendation on the bottom of the Sound.

Since then Cops 16 and 17 have been two more damp squibs. Let’s face it: continuing financial crisis + fossil fuel dependence + emerging nations = no consensus for 50 years.
But does that mean that we all should give up, like the thousands in this country who feel justified about throwing everything away because it all gets burnt and the generated energy warms our houses. Because two years ago I wrote the following words (“I decided to hold a climate conference of our own, at home. True, we didn’t reach a household consensus, but once we do we’ll meet the neighbours, and then the next apartment building, address by block, street by district etc”) and what have I done?

Nothing! I haven’t had a conflict with a neighbour since 1985. I might recycle, but when am I going to start telling strangers they don’t need to wrap their vegetables in ten plastic bags. But somehow I’ve got to change, because willing the fight against climate change isn’t enough anymore.

About


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”