367

Opinion

An actor’s life | Criticisng the critics

December 3rd, 2011


This article is more than 13 years old.

Thanks to all the readers of this column who came and experienced our production of Edward Albee’s ‘The Zoo Story’. Everyone involved and everyone who saw it has taken part in an adventure examining in essence what it is to be human. “To be or not to be,” according to Hamlet, or “What’s it all about Alfie?” according to Michael Caine.

A 16-year-old Danish boy who came reluctantly to see us, dragging his heels unwillingly as t’were, waited to see me in the foyer after the play one night. He shyly said that he had forgotten where he was as the play unfolded, and that he had no idea theatre could have such an effect on him. The 30 performances were worth it just for that one short sentence and a reminder to me of why I persist in this strange game called show business.

Good theatre has the power to do that. Thank goodness for good writers such as Edward Albee – the life-blood of, well, life itself.

To the Danish critics who told me that they wouldn’t be coming in to review us because they couldn’t “prioritise That Theatre Company this season”, I ask when have you actually ever done that? You obviously don’t care if your readers know about me, or what I’m trying to do here. That message has been delivered very clearly during my time in this country. What to do then? Keep doing excellent work with excellent people is my answer.

We perform in English but are proud to have worked with many Danish actors in our productions. The critics or members of something called The Reumert Committee (a bit like the Olivier Awards) who didn’t witness Adam Brix as Jerry in ‘The Zoo Story’, despite my encouragement, should feel embarrassed that they didn’t make the effort. He is quite simply one of the best actors I’ve ever had the pleasure to work with and hopefully will have the luck to really make a name for himself, both here and abroad.

All this showbiz tattle and reflection pales into insignificance when I think of the many far-more-important real-life stories being played around the world as I write this. A matter of life and death, for example, concerning a family member of some good friends of mine. My thoughts are with them and anyone else who is hanging on by a thread to this thing called life. Take a deep breath and enjoy doing that for as long as you can.

About


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”