318

Business

Maersk reaps profits and praise by taking it slow

admin
November 25th, 2011


This article is more than 13 years old.

World’s largest shipper calls slow steaming “win-win-win”

ItÂ’s not often that you hear of businesses boosting profits by slowing down, but thatÂ’s exactly what the Danish shipping giant Maersk Line has done. In addition, the company has earned the praise of environmental agencies for significantly cutting its carbon dioxide emissions.

Since 2008 Maersk has been saving huge amounts – of both cash and emissions – by reducing sailing speeds by an average of 27 percent.

“We finally dropped the old paradigm of just going faster and faster. This way is simply better for the bottom line and the environment,” Jacob Sterling, Maersk Line’s head of climate and environment, told Politiken newspaper.

The initiative is called ‘slow steaming’ and it has taken hold throughout the global shipping industry, not just at Maersk.

Whereas Maersk’s container ships used to sail at a speed of between 20 and 25 knots, they now average 15-20 knots. The 20 percent speed reduction saves 40 percent in fuel – with matching reductions in carbon dioxide emissions. And for a company with annual fuel bills of around 33 billion kroner, those savings are nothing to sneeze at.

To compensate for the slower sailing speeds, the shipping giant has increased frequency by adding one to two ships to each of its routes. Yet even with the extra ships, Maersk estimates that it has reduced emissions by seven percent per container since embracing slow steaming back in 2008.

“It’s a really good example of how initiatives that make a difference on the climate front aren’t necessarily coming out of the UN, but instead from underneath,” Richard Baron, the leader of the climate department of the International Energy Association (IEA), told Politiken.

“We have come to realise that it often pays economically-speaking to be climate friendly.”
Verdensnaturfonden, the Danish division of the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), praised Maersk for committing to reducing emissions.

“Maersk Line in particular has made a serious and broad effort,” John Nordbo,

VerdensnaturfondenÂ’s head of environmental and climate projects, told Politiken.

At first, slow steaming faced strong scepticism from engine manufacturers. But today even they acknowledge its advantages. The German multinational Man Diesel, which has a subsidiary in Copenhagen, is one large engine manufacturer that now fully promotes slow-speed engines as well as technologies that can be added to older engines to regulate them more efficiently at slower speeds.

According to the shipping industry analysts Mirae Asset Securities, widespread adoption of slow steaming is the biggest thing that has happened to the global shipping industry since the Second World War.

And thereÂ’s no foreseeable reason why shippers will speed up when the economy does.

Besides the cost savings and environmental advantages, Maersk maintains that slow steaming allows it to serve customers better by making scheduling and logistics more predictable.

Before, when trip times were predicted based on maximum sailing speeds, there was no way to compensate for delays. Now that planning is based on slower speeds, there is greater flexibility – and the opportunity to speed up for stretches, if necessary, in order to arrive on time. Slow sailing thus helps prevent delivery delays and bottlenecks at entry ports, Maersk Line reports.

“Slow steaming is here to stay because it is a win-win-win situation. It’s better for our customers, better for the environment, and better for our business,” Eivind Kolding, Maersk Line’s managing director, said.

The company has even invested in 20 of the gigantic, four-cornered Triple-E-class ships. Triple-Es are 30 percent more energy efficient than other new container ships and are actually designed to sail more slowly – and that’s a good thing.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”