331

Business

How foreigners could save the welfare state

admin
November 24th, 2011


This article is more than 13 years old.

Importing educated immigrants is a money maker for Denmark, new economic research shows

 

Following years of strident debate about whether immigration will be the death of DenmarkÂ’s welfare system, the irony is that certain immigrants could soon be seen as its saviours.

Facts presented in a just-released research study show that highly educated immigrants – whether they come from developed ‘Western’ countries or under-developed ‘non-Western’ ones – are putting far more money into the state’s coffers than they are taking out.

The Centre for Economic and Business Research (CEBR) study Â– which is co-funded by Microsoft and Dansk Industri (DI), an association representing more than 10,000 Danish companies – is the first of its kind to measure DenmarkÂ’s net profit from highly educated foreign workers.

Its conclusions are drawn from data from 3,500 highly-educated foreigners who were working in Denmark in 2009. A highly-educated foreigner was defined as someone with an advanced degree – a doctor, lawyer, PhD, MA, or MBA, for example.

The average highly-educated foreigner (not to be confused with ‘highly-skilled foreigners’, a term that specifically refers to those enjoying three-year tax breaks) who comes to Denmark with a partner and children, stays for eight years and puts an extra 1.9 million kroner into the state’s coffers – even after using the schools, hospitals, and other social benefits – the study concluded.

By contrast, the average highly-educated foreigner who comes to Denmark without children stays for six years and leaves the state with an extra 900,000 kroner in its treasure chest.

The researchers compared how highly educated ‘non-Western’ immigrants stacked up against their ‘Western’ counterparts in purely economic terms; they found that where the immigrants come from makes little difference. More significant are their areas of expertise.

While all highly-educated immigrants are more ‘profitable’ for the state than Danes, according to the study, immigrants with advanced degrees in the humanities contributed less than those with advanced degrees in the sciences. Foreign technical experts, like engineers and architects, fell somewhere in the middle.

Furthermore, the average newborn Danish baby will end up costing the state more than he or she contributes in cold hard kroner, while a highly-educated Dane who goes to school, works, and retires in Denmark is still less profitable for the state than a highly-educated foreigner who arrives already educated and leaves before retirement, according to the study.

Highly-educated foreigners use public childcare and health services at approximately one-third the rate of Danes, and they are also just one-third as likely as Danes to be involved in a crime or to use the criminal courts system.

At the same time, the study found, highly-educated foreigners pay significantly more in taxes each year than the average Dane does; the highly-educated ‘non-Western’ immigrants paid roughly 16 percent more than the average Dane, while the ‘Western’ ones paid roughly 32 percent more.

The study also showed that highly-educated foreigners were less likely than Danes to draw on public welfare benefits.

Besides paying higher taxes while using fewer public services, highly-educated foreigners also have a disproportionate effect on business growth at the firms they work for. Studies from 2010 and 2011 cited by CEBR have shown that Danish firms that hire foreign experts see higher rates of growth than firms that only have Danish experts on staff.

Jan Rose Skaksen, an economics professor from Copenhagen Business School, and one of the CEBR studyÂ’s authors, told Berlingske newspaper that the data surprised even him.

“It has now been demonstrated – and I am in fact really amazed – how large a profit the highly educated [foreigners] yield,” Skaksen said.

DIÂ’s CEO Karsten Dybvad hoped the study would motivate the government to look closer at the visa rules.

“Our need for highly-educated immigrants isn’t going to shrink in the future. How attractive we can be to them as a country has become a measure of our global competitiveness,” Dybvad said. “The government would do well to consider the rules quickly.”

Read the CEBR study (in Danish) here.

Join the debate – join us on Twitter or Facebook, or leave a comment below.

SEE RELATED STORIES

Immigrants rushed to apply before stricter rules took affect

Opinion: All immigrants do not have the same prerequisites for integration

Minister: All immigrants are not created equal

Opposition stumbles toward consensus on immigration

Welfare prescription: make immigrants pay


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”