680

Politics

Opposition under fire for picking private schools

admin
May 11th, 2010


This article is more than 14 years old.

Social Democrats stand firm on their policy lines behind public school education, but party leaders are choosing private school for their own children

 

The debate over politicians’ right to separate their private lives from their party dogma or job responsibilities has come to the media forefront again this week – this time with high profile Social Democrats seemingly crossing party lines to send their kids to private schools.

The government opposition party has long championed public schools as one of their key causes and lambasted the government over cuts within the educational sector. According to the Social Democrats’ own website, public schools are right up there as a key party issue along with health, the environment and integration.

‘No parent should have to feel it necessary to buy a place at a private school to give their children a proper schooling,’ reads the Social Democrats’ literature.

Now they are having to answer some tough questions, as it emerged this week that the party’s parliamentary group deputy chair, political spokeswoman and education spokesman all have their children enrolled in private schools. And party chairman Helle Thorning-Schmidt plans to remove her daughter from public school in favour of private in the autumn.

As a parent, her excuse for wanting a new school for her teenage daughter seems plausible enough. Apparently dozens of the young girl’s friends have made the switch from public to private in recent months and Thorning-Schmidt’s daughter wants to follow suit.

However as a politician, the Social Democrat leader has come under fire from opponents labelling her a hypocrite based on her former comments towards private schooling.

Liberal political spokesman Peter Christensen said it was a case of ‘double standards’ for top party members to chastise parents for making the move to private schools when they choose the same for their own families.

‘It’s in sharp contrast to the attack that the same party has launched against many parents who chose to go the private route,’ he said to TV2 News.

In 2002, Thorning-Schmidt contributed to a book with her views on education, saying there were many reasons a parent might choose a private school.

‘The most important explanation in many cases, however, is the selfish narrow-mindedness of the middle class,’ she wrote at the time.

Likewise, party colleague and political spokeswoman Mette Frederiksen has been vocal in her opposition to private schools in the past, but has now enrolled her daughter in one.

‘It’s no use that parents send their super kids to a private school as soon as there are problems in the public school. Everyone has a responsibility to make the public school system work. It means that one has to stay and take on the struggle to improve the school’s competency and environment instead of taking the kids out of the school,’ Frederiksen wrote in 2005.

According to Jyllands-Posten newspaper, 14 percent of Danish children are enrolled in private schools overall, while that figure increases to 24 percent for children of MPs. More than half of the Social Democrat MPs who have school age children have put them into private schools.

 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”